> Right now, busybox init doesn't work with devfs.  I have not
> looked into what changes are needed to make it work.  I agree
> though, that if we do go this route, we really want to avoid
> the cost of devfsd,
> 

bustbox 0.49pre-1 init does work with devfs, at least everything I've seen so
far works well.

-David


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to