On 31.V.2004 at 12:01 (+0200) Frans Pop wrote:
>
> Maybe another option would be:
> 4. Do the check as now but suppress this particular error situation
>(i.e. don't show the error to the user)
This error is generated by (lib)parted, not directly by partman. So
partman only knows that acordin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 31 May 2004 11:46, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> The function ped_file_system_check of libparted fails because parted
> lacks proper support for ext3 file systems. So for now there are
> three options:
>
> 1. Do the check as now - issues silly err
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 12:46:57PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> The function ped_file_system_check of libparted fails because parted
> lacks proper support for ext3 file systems. So for now there are
> three options:
What is the problem? It fails because the fs has some unknown flags
set?
Bast
On 21.V.2004 at 23:27 (+0200) Frans Pop wrote:
>
> This is an extremely silly error for a release candidate.
The function ped_file_system_check of libparted fails because parted
lacks proper support for ext3 file systems. So for now there are
three options:
1. Do the check as now - issues silly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 21 May 2004 17:22, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> I wish to see the following bugs fixed in the real Debian release:
>
> #243679: [powerpc] when checking the existing swap partition on
> powerpc/chrp/pegasos, freeze the box at around 37-41%
On 18.V.2004 at 02:37 (-0300) Joey Hess wrote:
> The next release of d-i should not be a beta. It should be something
> that we feel is suitable to be used in a real Debian release.
I wish to see the following bugs fixed in the real Debian release:
#243679: [powerpc] when checking the existing sw
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:37:52AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> I want to have people lined up ahead of time for each architecture who
> will be available to do some testing during both time periods. So please
> make a commitment now if you can.
Ok, i will again start doing daily netinst and netboot
Jon Peatfield wrote:
> Can I assume that the testing comes in at least 3 flavours:
>
> people to run through the installation in the easiest/normal way on
> hardware which has worked ok with previous betas (to check for
> accidental breakage).
>
> people to pound on it and take unusual pa
Hi Jon,
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:52:59PM +0100, Jon Peatfield wrote:
> Assuming that current issues for Alpha and sparc hardware are resolved
> I should be able to offer to do simple tests of:
> alpha ; a mix of old workstations
> netboot
> cdrom (I hope one will still work)
> I want to have people lined up ahead of time for each architecture who
> will be available to do some testing during both time periods. So please
> make a commitment now if you can.
>
> (I myself can promise that I will test i386 installs from: usb key (on
> real hardware) and on CD, floppy + ne
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:37:52AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> When we're checking out the test candidate, it's essential that we cover
> all arches and as many installation methods as we can. An important
> question is whether too many of our key testers -- folk like Bdale and
> Jeff Bailey -- will
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-18 13:30]:
> Yes, please use the wiki. Just go here:
> http://wiki.debian.net/?DebConf4DiHardware
I'll collect information and update the wiki in a few days, or maybe
daily.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> That's a point I raised on IRC recently as well. I think it would be
> good to compile a listing of hardware we'll have available at DebConf.
> I'll ask talk to some Brazilian people to see if they can find more
> wierd architectures. Can we collect this information some
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> Then would someone please upload base-installer_0.81? .80 has already
> made it into testing and .81 fixes the m68k cdrom errata.
I've asked on irc, to get this done (unfortantly, I have lost my gpg key
and will not be able to do any uploads until I get back home after
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-18 02:37]:
> When we're checking out the test candidate, it's essential that we cover
> all arches and as many installation methods as we can. An important
> question is whether too many of our key testers -- folk like Bdale and
> Jeff Bailey -- will be at t
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:37:52AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> The next release of d-i should not be a beta. It should be something
> that we feel is suitable to be used in a real Debian release. This means
> that we can't afford to put out a release with significant known bugs of
> the kind document
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> (I myself can promise that I will test i386 installs from: usb key (on
> real hardware) and on CD, floppy + network, and floppy + cd (vmware).
> Also 32 mb installs from floppy and from CD. Oh, and 2.6 installs from
> usb key and from CD. I will be unable t
The next release of d-i should not be a beta. It should be something
that we feel is suitable to be used in a real Debian release. This means
that we can't afford to put out a release with significant known bugs of
the kind documented in the errata, if fixes are known for the bugs.
In trying to co
18 matches
Mail list logo
