Hello,
I am closing this bug report.
The submitter did not reply to my call for further information, and this
is something affecting the potato or woody boot-floppies and 2.2 kernels
anyway.
I asked for feedback on this one on october 6, more than two month ago,
and got no replies except spams.
)
id f5TAhYgF025539; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 12:43:34 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Joerg Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: problems on serial console with potato boot-floppies
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mai
tes, so they will probably
be included if another potato point-release is made.
Speaking of which, is another such release planned? Or are the
potato boot-floppies dead? If they aren't, should we backport the
vt102 fix?
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
For people who care about powerpc stuff
While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
ia32 floppies. Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to
build a boot floppy for oldworld apple powermacs that solves the
dreaded no response from keyboard w
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 08:29:26PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> boot-floppies build system works. ~:^) Contrary to popular myth,
> 2.2r2 can't be obsolete until r3 is released. It hasn't been
> released, has it? Believe it or not, I'm trying to help out here.
It has been finalized. I believe
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:24:25PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > Perhaps you all should have read my post more fully. It is NOT an
> > old kernel, it is 2.2.18pre21 and I tested an install. It works
> > fine for 2.2.r2 Debian as I said. It SHOULD be used unless yo
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:24:25PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> Perhaps you all should have read my post more fully. It is NOT an
> old kernel, it is 2.2.18pre21 and I tested an install. It works
> fine for 2.2.r2 Debian as I said. It SHOULD be used unless you are
> posting yours for 2.2r2.
Th
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:24:25PM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> Perhaps you all should have read my post more fully. It is NOT an
> old kernel, it is 2.2.18pre21 and I tested an install. It works
^^^
no where in your message did you say this, all you said is it worke
Perhaps you all should have read my post more fully. It is NOT an
old kernel, it is 2.2.18pre21 and I tested an install. It works
fine for 2.2.r2 Debian as I said. It SHOULD be used unless you are
posting yours for 2.2r2.
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:51:29AM -0700, A
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > his image is just the old 2.2.16 boot floppy since the potato r2 boot
> > > floppies are broken. drow is trying to fix that in the r3 boot
> > > floppies.
> >
> > ARGS. Is he "trying to fix this" or did he "actually fix this"?
> >
> > Drow, it would be a good tim
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 01:51:29AM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> For people who care about powerpc stuff
>
> While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
> ia32 floppies. Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to
Of course, I've built them eight times in the pas
Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 03:04:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > > For people who care about powerpc stuff
> > >
> > > While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
> > > ia32 floppies. Having no patience, I have taken t
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 03:04:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > For people who care about powerpc stuff
> >
> > While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
> > ia32 floppies. Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to
> > build a boot f
Andrew Sharp wrote:
> For people who care about powerpc stuff
>
> While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
> ia32 floppies. Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to
> build a boot floppy for oldworld apple powermacs that solves the
> dreaded no response fro
For people who care about powerpc stuff
While the changelog below mentions powerpc, these are of course only
ia32 floppies. Having no patience, I have taken the liberty to
build a boot floppy for oldworld apple powermacs that solves the
dreaded no response from keyboard when prompting to ins
You can find 2.2.23 of i386 boot-floppies (already uploaded for
Potato) at
http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/2.2.23-2001-04-14/
Please test these, especially if you have udma drive controller or a
lot of IDE drives (such as hdh).
Included is the change log.
I have a version of the boot-floppies (installation system) available
for i386 at
http://people.debian.org/~aph/current/
Especially people who had trouble in combination with *BSD disk
slices, this version should fix those. There are a number of other
fixes as well, such as the termwrap dy
We've put together one last version of the boot-floppies for Potato.
I was hoping to get new kernels for i386 (straight 2.2.18) plus
PCMCIA, but we can rebuild with those images when they are available.
Someone please try out the version for i386 at
http://people.debian.org/~aph/current/> and le
It helps if I give a URL, eh?
http://auric.debian.org/~aph/bf/2.2.17-2000-09-14/>
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We're trying to pull together 2.2.17 boot-floppies release. It fixes
a lot of problems relative to the 2.2.16 boot-floppies -- see
changelog snippet below.
This is the Martin Schultz release -- kudos to him to all his hard
work chugging thru the bugs.
I know a lot of people have moved on from
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:41:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I'm okay with being a little laggy with boot-floppies, especially if m68k
> is okay for release, since I'm working on the assumption that m68k'll
> take the most time to build and upload.
Did you send the list of required packages to
Joerg Friedrich:
> But this leeds into serious problems if a third party bootloader is used,
> i.e. IBM (OS/2) Bootloader, Powerquest Bootmagic (comes with Partition
> Magic)
Yes, this was the most annoying thing I found when I installed Debian on my
two machines, it simply wouldn't place LILO a
> I think we wait to tausq to upload -compact and -idepci flavor and for
> corresponding pcmcia packages. And b-f has to be updatet for 2.2.16
i'll do that in the next couple of days.
i think it's kinda poetic that we have 2.2.16 b-f and 2.2.16
boot-floppies... :-)
randolph
--
Debian Developer
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Petr Cech wrote:
> > * #64823: incorrect LILO automatic placement on i386; 22 days old
>
> I think the subject is missleading. It only doesn't want to put LILO into
> extended partition. Let's call it a feature :)
But this leeds into serious problems if a third party bo
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 03:39:34PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> I think we wait to tausq to upload -compact and -idepci flavor and for
> corresponding pcmcia packages. And b-f has to be updatet for 2.2.16
Okay, assuming all that was pretty much correct and indicative, we
should have all the source u
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 09:55:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> ? Or are these not really RC? (If the latter, please downgrade them
> appropriately)
>
> Basically, what I'm asking is, as far as source is concerned, are you
> ready to go? I realise you need to wait for updated base packages befor
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 09:55:31PM +1000 , Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> Congratulations guys: -testing seems to hold nothing but praise for potato
> upgrades, looks good.
cool
> Is there anything more you're intending to do to b-f for potato,
> beyond 2.2.15? Alternately, do whatever
Hello world,
Congratulations guys: -testing seems to hold nothing but praise for potato
upgrades, looks good.
Is there anything more you're intending to do to b-f for potato,
beyond 2.2.15? Alternately, do whatever changes you already have in CVS
account for:
critical bugs - outstanding
*
28 matches
Mail list logo
