Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> victory wrote:
> >
> > w/o fallback (xsl:otherwise), generating en.pdf issues strange error ():
> > Character U+2CB (Ë‹) not in font
> > '[lmroman10-regular]:mapping=tex-text!
> > Missing character: There is no Ë‹ in font
> > [lmroman10-regular]:mapping=te
Hi,
victory wrote:
>
> w/o fallback (xsl:otherwise), generating en.pdf issues strange error ():
> Character U+2CB (Ë‹) not in font
> '[lmroman10-regular]:mapping=tex-text!
> Missing character: There is no Ë‹ in font
> [lmroman10-regular]:mapping=tex-text!
> Missing character: There is no Ë‹ in
w/o fallback (xsl:otherwise), generating en.pdf issues strange error ():
Character U+2CB (Ë‹) not in font
'[lmroman10-regular]:mapping=tex-text!
Missing character: There is no Ë‹ in font [lmroman10-regular]:mapping=tex-text!
Missing character: There is no Ë‹ in font [lmroman10-regular]:mapping=te
Hi,
victory wrote:
>
> more packages may be needed, though
>
> Index: debian/control
> ===
> --- debian/control(revision 70430)
> +++ debian/control(working copy)
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk
more packages may be needed, though
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control (revision 70430)
+++ debian/control (working copy)
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk/manual
Vcs-Browser: http://anonsc
> victory wrote:
> > using fonts-wqy-microhei works for ko, which looks like ok for zh, too.
> > it has Japanese letters, too,
> > but some of them mismatch between its glyph and the ones we are using.
> > this is the reason we do not choose fonts for zh letters, saying "CJK".
> > the selected f
Hi,
victory wrote:
>
> using fonts-wqy-microhei works for ko, which looks like ok for zh, too.
> it has Japanese letters, too,
> but some of them mismatch between its glyph and the ones we are using.
> this is the reason we do not choose fonts for zh letters, saying "CJK".
> the selected font m
using fonts-wqy-microhei works for ko, which looks like ok for zh, too.
it has Japanese letters, too,
but some of them mismatch between its glyph and the ones we are using.
this is the reason we do not choose fonts for zh letters, saying "CJK".
the selected font may have such situation for zh/ko
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> victory wrote:
> >
> > building **.pdf succeeded by using dblatex instead of jade;
> > all en/el/ja/vi/zh_CN/zh_TW builds succeeded;
> > of course I dont read their letters, just looked at a glance.
> > not tested for non-disabled-langs other than en,
> > b
Hi,
victory wrote:
>
> building **.pdf succeeded by using dblatex instead of jade;
> all en/el/ja/vi/zh_CN/zh_TW builds succeeded;
> of course I dont read their letters, just looked at a glance.
> not tested for non-disabled-langs other than en,
> but I think those do not fail by dblatex, eithe
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 06:53:11 +0100
Geert Stappers wrote:
> when language is vietnamese
> seems to be missing ...
> > +
> > +\setmainfont{FreeSerif}
> > +\setsansfont{FreeSans}
> > +\setmonofont{FreeMono}
> > +
no.
no vietnamese-specific
This posting is for getting '[patch]' in the subject line.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 01:59:04PM +0900, victory wrote:
>
> building **.pdf succeeded by using dblatex instead of jade;
> all en/el/ja/vi/zh_CN/zh_TW builds succeeded;
> of course I dont read their letters, just looked at a glance.
> no
building **.pdf succeeded by using dblatex instead of jade;
all en/el/ja/vi/zh_CN/zh_TW builds succeeded;
of course I dont read their letters, just looked at a glance.
not tested for non-disabled-langs other than en,
but I think those do not fail by dblatex, either.
patch is below.
Index: build/
13 matches
Mail list logo
