Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-20 Thread Horms
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:46:39PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:41:26PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:2

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-20 16:13]: > mips > No abiname. Kernel updated and in testing; udebs updated. > No initrd daily builds since Dec 31 so new udebs untested. I made the daily build on Dec 31 with the new kernel so udebs are tested. In any case, I asked Thiemo Seu

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:11:14PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > I have no idea about the abichanges, m68k uses no abiname? Is that a > > > problem? > > The downside of not includeing an abiname in the package name is that > > past d-i releases will break once the updated kernels and

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-20 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:58:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make > > it > > urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old > > For 2.4.27 I am waiting for the latest kernel-source to be released be

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:25:47PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > > Update for current status, 10 days after my first mail: > > > > m68k > > No abiname; not updated. ? > > > > [This is another arch that I'd consider

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-20 Thread Joey Hess
Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make it > urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old > For 2.4.27 I am waiting for the latest kernel-source to be released before I > build new images. This is supposed to happen today/tomorrow? I

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-20 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Update for current status, 10 days after my first mail: > > m68k > No abiname; not updated. ? > > [This is another arch that I'd consider releasing d-i rc3 without > it being updated for the kernel security fixes.]

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-20 Thread Joey Hess
Joey Hess wrote: > Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at > least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel > module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel > "abiname". Here's my understanding of the current status of that: Upd

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-20 Thread Horms
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:41:26PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]: > > > > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-14 Thread Horms
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]: > > > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that) are > > > > mips and mipsel have been updated.

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 04:24:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at > least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel > module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel > "abiname". Here's my underst

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-13 Thread Horms
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]: > > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that) are > > mips and mipsel have been updated. However, given the new local root > exploit (fixed in SVN), we'

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-11 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Joey Hess wrote: > Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago. > > Do you or maybe vorlon plan to rebuild linux-kernel-di-alpha with > them? I'll update the package tomorrow. Norbert

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-11 Thread Joey Hess
Steve Langasek wrote: > For 2.4, this requires i2c, kernel-latest-2.4-i386, linux-wlan-ng, > lm-sensors, and oprofile-source to be ready to go at the same time with > packages built against the new ABI. Of these, oprofile-source has had a > recent upload, but has only out-of-date modules (none bui

Request update of partman for Sarge (was: kernel abiname transition and security updates status)

2005-01-11 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 11:54, Christian Perrier wrote: > For *very very* nasty errors (such as a bad spelling error which would > make every single Bulgarian user laugh loudly), you may request for an > update and get a chance that someone takes care of it. For Dutch I have done several spelli

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-11 Thread Joey Hess
Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago. Do you or maybe vorlon plan to rebuild linux-kernel-di-alpha with them? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-11 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Ognyan Kulev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Specifically for the Bulgarian translation, there aren't any major > problems that I'm aware of :-) There were some inconsistencies in the > translation of the 2nd level but I have to refresh my experience with > debian-installer before complaining a

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-11 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Christian Perrier wrote: RC3 or whatever it will be called will be based on the sarge branch. So, indeed, as far as Bulgarian is concerned, you're already complete. However, if you have fixes to the translations, you should commit them to the sarge branch. Please note, however that no systematic up

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-11 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Ognyan Kulev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Joey Hess wrote: > >Before we can release d-i rc3 > > Will translation updates be allowed for RC3? If yes (I hope), what's the > time frame and to which branch they should go in? RC3 or whatever it will be called will be based on the sarge branch. So,

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-11 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Joey Hess wrote: Before we can release d-i rc3 Will translation updates be allowed for RC3? If yes (I hope), what's the time frame and to which branch they should go in? Regards, ogi

Re: Next d-i release name (was: Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status)

2005-01-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:12:59AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > What is "quite a few" changes here? I thought the next d-i release was > > > going to be bugfixes and kernel updates only? > > I think Christian really meant "quite few" (i.e. "no

Re: Next d-i release name (was: Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status)

2005-01-11 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > What is "quite a few" changes here? I thought the next d-i release was > > going to be bugfixes and kernel updates only? > > I think Christian really meant "quite few" (i.e. "not many") rather than > "quite a few" (i.e. "several") here. Bingo. I hav

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-11 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Joey Hess wrote: > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that) > are updated. Updated alpha packages were accepted a few hours ago. Norbert

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 04:24:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at > least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel > module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel > "abiname". Here's my underst

Re: Next d-i release name (was: Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status)

2005-01-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 03:44:37PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:17:09PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at > > > Should it be called RC3 or "whatever bet

Re: Next d-i release name (was: Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status)

2005-01-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:17:09PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at > Should it be called RC3 or "whatever better sounds like an official > release name"? > Given that we indeed made

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]: > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not tracking that) are mips and mipsel have been updated. However, given the new local root exploit (fixed in SVN), we'll all need to make another round of updates anyway. -- Martin Michlmayr h

Next d-i release name (was: Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status)

2005-01-10 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at Should it be called RC3 or "whatever better sounds like an official release name"? Given that we indeed made quite few(?) changes, isn't it time for an official stamped release?

kernel abiname transition and security updates status

2005-01-10 Thread Joey Hess
Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel "abiname". Here's my understanding of the current status of that: i386 2.4 and 2.6 upd