Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:22:19 +0200
with message-id <201308301222.22550.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line size is advertised as 280mb now, thus closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #711683,
regarding debian-installer: Wheezy netinst image does not fit into MiniCD
Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:25:50 +0200
with message-id <201308251426.17126.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #703404,
regarding debian-installer: wheezy (PXE boot) failes to install busybox and
kernel
Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 01:34:32 +0200
with message-id <201308250135.02500.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #695116,
regarding debian-installer: wheezy b4: hdmedia installer unmounts usb stick
to be
Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 01:34:32 +0200
with message-id <201308250135.02500.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #675094,
regarding debian-installer: wheezy installer: you can bypass errors with
Previous
Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 01:34:32 +0200
with message-id <201308250135.02500.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #673110,
regarding debian-installer: wheezy installer on macmini3, 1 should run gptsync
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:53:10 +0200
with message-id <201307211553.37517.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #693448,
regarding debian installer wheezy beta 3 amd64 CD -1 hangs when trying to eject
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Debian Wheezy netinst ISO file is too big to fit into MiniCD (current
size is about ~221 MiB¹ while MiniCD's capacity is around ~210 MiB²).
On the other hand, documents³ state this file is about 180 MiB which
currently does not match the reality.
¹
h
Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:03:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#706112: fixed in grub-installer 1.86
has caused the Debian Bug report #706112,
regarding debian-installer: Wheezy installer always install bootloader in
/dev/sda
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
Schloss (25/04/2013):
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: serious
>
> Default x86_64 Installation CD of Wheezy has next bug:
> - while it is asking to install bootloader it isn't asking where to
> install bootloader
>
> In this case, when I install Debian from usb-flash-drive on another
Quoting Vincent McIntyre (vincent.mcint...@csiro.au):
> b) modify po/sublevel1/template.po to point to the new question like this:
> #. Type: select
> #. Choices
> #: ../choose-mirror-bin.templates.http-in:2001
> #: ../choose-mirror-bin.templates.ftp.sel-in:2001
> +#: ../grub-installer.templat
Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> I found the string, in po/sublevel1, here's the templates.po
> #. Type: select
> #. Choices
> #: ../choose-mirror-bin.templates.http-in:2001
> #: ../choose-mirror-bin.templates.ftp.sel-in:2001
> msgid "enter information manually"
> msgstr ""
>
> Is it the case that I need
Hi,
just another how-to-reproduce: run d-i on a system with
/boot on RAID 1 and / on LVM on RAID 10 on five discs.
d-i (priority=low) asks whether to install grub2 to the
MBR, I say yes, and it installs to /dev/sda, so I’ll have
to, later, in the installed system, reconfigure it to tell
it to ins
Hi Joey
thank you for your helpful comments. I'm working on fixing the issues.
I do have one question because I'm completely new to the translation
side of things...
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 08:28:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> There are also some hardcoded user-visible strings embedded in the
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Do you know how the problem can be triggerd. As far as I remember only
> some installation from USB are affected and I don't know if the
> difference between those affected and those unaffected has ever been
> identified. If I know that I'm testing the right test case, I'm
Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> It's entirely possible this patch is not the full resolution of the various
> issues people have reported but I'm posting it to get feedback on the
> approach and get some help with correctly integrating it into d-i.
This adds a new translatable template, which it is far
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:33:01AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> Hi Vince
>
> >
> > Please see my working (for me), tested, waiting-for-review patch [1]
> > sent to the -boot list yesterday.
>
> Do you know how the problem can be triggerd. As far as I remember only
> some installation from
Hi Vince
Vincent McIntyre writes:
>> Sadly, this issue will probably be in wheezy as nobody digged enough
>> to tackle this down and we get rid of it before the last version of
>> D-I is released.
>
>
> Please see my working (for me), tested, waiting-for-review patch [1]
> sent to the -boot li
> Sadly, this issue will probably be in wheezy as nobody digged enough
> to tackle this down and we get rid of it before the last version of
> D-I is released.
Please see my working (for me), tested, waiting-for-review patch [1]
sent to the -boot list yesterday.
Cheers
Vince
[1] https://lists.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 706112 grub-installer
Bug #706112 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Wheezy installer always
install bootloader in /dev/sda
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'grub-installer'.
Ignoring request
reassign 706112 grub-installer
thanks
Quoting Schloss (schloss.kirchlau...@yandex.ru):
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: serious
>
> Default x86_64 Installation CD of Wheezy has next bug:
> - while it is asking to install bootloader it isn't asking where to
> install bootloader
>
> In this
Package: debian-installer
Severity: serious
Default x86_64 Installation CD of Wheezy has next bug:
- while it is asking to install bootloader it isn't asking where to
install bootloader
In this case, when I install Debian from usb-flash-drive on another
usb-hard-drive and those names are, for exa
Hi,
Konrad Vrba wrote:
> can somebody please fix this bug?
I think this will be fixed with the Wheezy D-I RC2 release which is
currently prepared and expected in a few days.
And yes, it's annoying. Ran into that several times. There are several
workarounds posted in the related bug-reports:
htt
can somebody please fix this bug?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAF2Nc0z26jWWNUzzv7RQtmHa6puNu3Tb8=86zrajggizkxd...@mail.gmail.com
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20130211
Followup-For: Bug #703404
Hi,
I don't understand why bug #703146 is not already fixed,
but here is a workaround based on the suggestion of
Pierre Blondeau (http://bugs.debian.org/703404#112):
It consists to modify /bin/apt-install in the initrd to make
I have tried the expert mode (google got me there in about 10 secs) but
no luck whatsoever. First of all: Pierre Blondeau says:
>During the system base installation, the installer ask you to choice
your kernel version.
That implies that you get that far. When I submitted this bug, I did
inde
debootstrap version 1.0.47 has been in sid for a while now. When can we
expect it in wheezy?
If that is going to take long, I suggest reverting apt (in wheezy) to
the version that masks the problems with debootstrap.
@Pierre Blondeau
Nice, what parameters did you use to get from a simple pxe bo
from the various contributions, it is not clear (to me) whether or not
this has any conclusion. Is there a way to avoid this problem during
installation?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 703404 important
Bug #703404 [debian-installer] debian-installer: wheezy (PXE boot) failes to
install busybox and kernel
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Ple
severity 703404 important
thanks
Quoting Tycho Lursen (tycholur...@gmail.com):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: wheezy
> Severity: critical
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: breaks the whole system
No, it doesn't. :-). Hence lowering the severity.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I came across this problem too today.
I believe this bugreport is related:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703146
In my case it all starts with this warning in my logs:
base-installer: W: GPG error: http://ftp.nl.debian.org wheezy Release:
The following signatures were invalid: B
>19.03.2013 15:29, Konrad Vrba wrote:
>> I see, but custom kernel without initramfs should work. If there is a
>> way to skip installing busybox, I would appreciate.
>
>That appears to be a wrong solution to a wrong problem.
>
>Something is wrong with the archive mirror system apparently, or with
>
19.03.2013 15:29, Konrad Vrba wrote:
> I see, but custom kernel without initramfs should work. If there is a
> way to skip installing busybox, I would appreciate.
That appears to be a wrong solution to a wrong problem.
Something is wrong with the archive mirror system apparently, or with
the sign
On 3/19/13, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 19.03.2013 15:04, Konrad Vrba пишет:
>> I have exactly the same problem, as described.
>> Is there away to specify (in preseeding) to skip installing busybox ?
>
> Busybox is used in regular initramfs. While techincally initramfs might
> work without busybox,
19.03.2013 15:04, Konrad Vrba пишет:
> I have exactly the same problem, as described.
> Is there away to specify (in preseeding) to skip installing busybox ?
Busybox is used in regular initramfs. While techincally initramfs might
work without busybox, no one really test things that way. So basic
I have exactly the same problem, as described.
Is there away to specify (in preseeding) to skip installing busybox ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CA
Package: debian-installer
Version: wheezy
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I tried to do a clean install of wheezy i386 using my pxe boot se
Package: debian-installer
Version: wheezy b4
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
I am using preseeding, and have created a usbstick exactly as for squeeze
(where it works). I have put vmlinuz, initrd, preseed file and iso image in
root. During installation, first everything works well: hd-media is mounte
package: debian-installer
(cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI sense: NOT READY asc:53,0 (media load or reject failed)
and the installation itself fails to boot once I reboot it (grub
screen appears, but get a blank screen with a cursor.
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
You have to keep reminding your governme
Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:51:17 +0200
with message-id <20120922185117.12871a57.li...@wansing-online.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#685464: [debian installer] wheezy debian installer,
netinst.iso and local
has caused the Debian Bug report #685464,
regarding [debian installer]
The problem is solved. I tried again, using the same steps, and all
wheezy installer components are downloaded and used as expected.
MFG,
Karsten Kruse
--
()
<\/> I like apple pie. I derive no joy, however, from
_/\_ watching someone else eat it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 681673 installation-reports
Bug #681673 [installer and installation iso] amd64 installer fails
Warning: Unknown package 'installer'
Warning: Unknown package 'installation'
Warning: Unknown package 'iso'
Bug reassigned from package 'instal
sorry for my little english i want ask if is possible to insert on the wheezy
the squeezy installer i can install whezzy only such in expert mode, it need
not to install nework, and when installed, on the boot stop, i have used many
of your installer .this dont matchbye pzok
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 685464 installation-reports
Bug #685464 [debian installer] [debian installer] wheezy debian installer,
netinst.iso and local mirror
Warning: Unknown package 'debian'
Warning: Unknown package 'installer'
Bug
Hi Miguel,
On 29/05/2012 22:46, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
it seems an already known issue in the daily builds - please check #674100 [1]
#673997 [2].
I don't think so.
The Debian installer must block the installation process if you have a
grave error (if you cannot install the base system yo
Hi,
it seems an already known issue in the daily builds - please check #674100 [1]
#673997 [2].
Debian Installer 7 Alpha 1 [3] doesn't suffer from this.
1 - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674100
2 - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673997
3 - http://cdimage.debi
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I try to install Wheezy on a new machine, I downloaded the
debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso [1] build at 29-May-2012 17:31
During the base system installation I get an error on installing busybox
(I don't know if there is a problem on
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
I recently re-installed after replacing a drive on macmini3,1 which worked
nearly flawlessly except
that I needed to drop to a shell and install gptsync and run it during the "now
we'll reboot" dialog at
th
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 21:50:44 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> * Linux kernel installation fails on old x86 processors (earlier
>than 686, or 686 without PAE) (#672611).
Should just be 686 without PAE I think, older CPUs would get the 486
flavour, not 686.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
D
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:50:44PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I prepared the following draft, based on copy-pastes from:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/ReleaseAnnounce
>
>I took the liberty to replace “Wheezy” with “7.0” to match the previous
>announce, which mentioned “
Thank you Cyril and everyone.
In terms of presentation, this looks fine to me. In terms of content, I
added all issues from DebianInstaller/Today which I'm confident affect
alpha1 (that is, 1 issue).
On 2012-05-12 15:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi folks,
I prepared the following draft, based
Hi folks,
I prepared the following draft, based on copy-pastes from:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/ReleaseAnnounce
I took the liberty to replace “Wheezy” with “7.0” to match the previous
announce, which mentioned “6.0”. I have no strong (or bad) feeling about
this, just wanted to be co
Quoting shirish शिरीष (shirisha...@gmail.com):
> Hi all,
> Please CC me if somebody responds to the topic.
>
> While browsing on/around the Wiki I came to
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/WheezyGoals and this isn't a
> nice place to share the wheezy goals. A much better place is/would b
Hi all,
Please CC me if somebody responds to the topic.
While browsing on/around the Wiki I came to
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/WheezyGoals and this isn't a
nice place to share the wheezy goals. A much better place is/would be
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals with something like
h
53 matches
Mail list logo
