Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2023 13:34:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#983311: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.132
has caused the Debian Bug report #983311,
regarding debootstrap: debian/tests/fake/schroot-1.6.10-3 does not behave the
same as schroot 1.6.10-3
to be marked as done
that behaves like schroot *should* behave, that
already exists, as debian/tests/fake/schroot-proposed, which emulates
the behaviour that I asked for in schroot bug #856877. However, until
we have a stable release in which #856877 has been fixed in schroot,
I think debootstrap should still have test cov
Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:36:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#706191: fixed in choose-mirror 2.58
has caused the Debian Bug report #706191,
regarding debian-installer: mirror/http/hostname should behave better when
given http://hostname as an argument.
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 706191 choose-mirror
Bug #706191 [debian-installer] debian-installer: mirror/http/hostname should
behave better when given http://hostname as an argument.
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'choose
reassign 706191 choose-mirror
severity 706191 wishlist
thanks
Quoting dcooley (dcoo...@mauilion.com):
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>
>When installing a new system via pxe.
>
>* What exactly did you
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
When installing a new system via pxe.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I specified mirror/http/hostname=http://mirrorurl.com
* Wha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 395489 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#395489: Handler for single MULTISELECT questions does not behave correctly
when the BACK button is pressed
Bug reassigned from package `rootskel-gtk' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
>
End of message, sto
Package: rootskel-gtk
Severity: minor
When a checkbox is activated/deactivated, the corresponding question is
imemdiatly updated in the questions database, so pressing the BACK
button won't restore the question's original values.
Attilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
ia64 isos should be bootable via this path from the EFI Boot Manager:
Boot Option Maintenace Menu
-> Boot from a File
-> Debian Inst [Acpi(HWP0002,0)/Pci(2|0)/Ata(Primary,Master)/CDROM(
I believe the magic for this is the bootia64.efi file, whi
Denton,
Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004
http://www.8006hosting.com/cd/
albright,at their head.
Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:43:11 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in beta 3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
[Denis Barbier]
>> The purpose of languagechooser is to ask the person doing the
>> installation about his preferred language. This information can be
>> used to choose which language to use during installation and set
>> this language as the default language after the installation.
>
> Right, bu
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:33:57PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Denis Barbier]
> > Maybe I missed the purpose of languagechooser? Is it supposed to
> > select installation language, or locales when the system is up? IMO
> > it should be the former, then only languages which provide
> > tr
[Denis Barbier]
> Maybe I missed the purpose of languagechooser? Is it supposed to
> select installation language, or locales when the system is up? IMO
> it should be the former, then only languages which provide
> translated debconf templates for debian-installer should be listed.
The purpose
tis 2003-02-25 klockan 10.26 skrev Denis Barbier:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:51:01PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [...]
> > > Does this mean that LANGUAGE is fully determined by this locale, or
> > > can it be edited?
> >
> > I want it to be fully determined by the locale, and do not see
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:51:01PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[...]
> > Does this mean that LANGUAGE is fully determined by this locale, or
> > can it be edited?
>
> I want it to be fully determined by the locale, and do not see the
> need to edit it manually. Do you think the first time u
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:51:01PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Denis Barbier]
> > I disagree, there is no reason to propose languages which have no
> > translated templates.
>
> Actually, I use this information to also set the default language in
> KDE and GNOME, as well as the default di
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 23:33, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Hi, you did not send your message to debian-boot, do you want to post
> it again, or do you want me to reply there?
>
Sorry. Late night. I meant debian-boot.
> Denis
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:08:23PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
[Denis Barbier]
> I disagree, there is no reason to propose languages which have no
> translated templates.
Actually, I use this information to also set the default language in
KDE and GNOME, as well as the default dictionary in ispell. But there
is no reason to list _all_ languages available, bu
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:01:05PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[...]
> This package should behava as follows:
>
> 0. extract available languages from list of available locales
> (mapping language code -> language name)
I disagree, there is no reason to propose languages which have no
I find the current languagechooser complex and non-intuitive. To make
sure everyone know where I want it to move, I wrote down a little
description on where I want the package to move. I know we have been
discussing these things lately, so I thought this was good time to get
something down in wr
Package: modconf
Version: 0.2.32
Severity: wishlist
While going through the boot-floppies install I had to rm -rf /target/ because
I wanted to try installing the base system again. When I got to the
'configure device drivers' section modconf was clever enough to see that I
alreay has 3c509 in
22 matches
Mail list logo
