The release notes and links to them have been fixed in the latest
boot-floppies sources. Also the documentation contents of the
install-doc package.
The bugs will show as pending and not marked as fixed until 3.0.24
makes it into the archive.
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://w
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:11:12PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
[...]
> As said, #148054. Release-notes are not build in the install-doc
> package.
It is #148509
> IMHO we should fix the boot-floppies documentation build system
> to provide an own copy of Release-Notes, but if you have a better ide
#include
* Josip Rodin [Fri, Dec 20 2002, 09:51:01PM]:
> > > Bug #148509 is still around, bf-doc_3.0.24_i386.tar.gz does not contain
> > > release notes.
> >
> > As far as I can see, Release-Notes are no longer part of built
> > installation documentation. Only their SGML source. So should we st
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:20:50PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > Well, now it is your time to prepare the new release, please look at
> > > http://people.debian.org/~blade/bf3024/.
> >
> > Bug #148509 is still around, bf-doc_3.0.24_i386.tar.gz does not contain
> > release notes.
>
> As far as
#include
* Denis Barbier [Fri, Dec 20 2002, 10:33:15AM]:
> > Well, now it is your time to prepare the new release, please look at
> > http://people.debian.org/~blade/bf3024/.
>
> Bug #148509 is still around, bf-doc_3.0.24_i386.tar.gz does not contain
> release notes.
As far as I can see, Releas
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:52:05AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
[...]
> Well, now it is your time to prepare the new release, please look at
> http://people.debian.org/~blade/bf3024/.
Bug #148509 is still around, bf-doc_3.0.24_i386.tar.gz does not contain
release notes.
Denis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
#include
* Christian T. Steigies [Tue, Dec 10 2002, 11:26:08PM]:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:35:37AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >
> > There were some changes now. As said, I did not consider m68k ;)
> > problems as hot problems since there are no "pending" bug reports, even
> > no scarying bug
#include
* Christian T. Steigies [Mon, Dec 09 2002, 11:00:19PM]:
> > - get updated kernel packages for architectures that need it. I expect
> >2.4.20-bf2.4/i386 soon, with fixed Ext3, of course
> >
> > - tag and start building of bf-3.0.24 short after 3.0r1. Joey is going
> >to releas
#include
* Adam DiCarlo [Mon, Dec 09 2002, 12:42:01AM]:
> > I've asked here twice for a new release of the (woody) boot-floppies, since
> > they fix a problem which is present in the current m68k version. It would be
> > nice, if this could be released before 3.0.1 is made. Unless we sneak in the
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:21:19PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> >
> > Hey guys, I was unsubscribed from this group and swamped with RL work
> > for a while, but I'm back. If there are any issues folks need my
> > attention on that were sent h
Hey guys, I was unsubscribed from this group and swamped with RL work
for a while, but I'm back. If there are any issues folks need my
attention on that were sent here, please resend them to me directly.
If you do want my attention, its sometimes best to send mail directly
to me. I don't mind b
11 matches
Mail list logo
