#include <hallo.h> * Christian T. Steigies [Mon, Dec 09 2002, 11:00:19PM]:
> > - get updated kernel packages for architectures that need it. I expect > > 2.4.20-bf2.4/i386 soon, with fixed Ext3, of course > > > > - tag and start building of bf-3.0.24 short after 3.0r1. Joey is going > > to release 3.0r1 very soon. > > > > I think, the problems with s390 and m86k are kinda nasty, but can wait > > <flamebait>its m68k, but I knew you were ignoring us</flamebait> *g*. How did you know? > > till the begin of 2003. Boot-Floppies should have some testing before. > > There are IMHO too many changes commited (or outstanding) for making a > > rash release just to get it into r1. > > rash release? I've asked the first time when, in September? I haven't seen > the sun for a month, but I thinks its December by now. The 3.0.24 build on > my klecker page works just fine, because when I built it, there weren't many > changes, except for people trying to break documentation, and the m68k fix. Yes, we have December, close to r1 release and that is the problem. > If it were possible, we could use just this, but then arches would be out of > sync. I guess by breaking some rules, I could still get the fix for m68k in, > but I guess its not worth it, imagine how many people had to update their > another-evil-debian-problem-and-here-comes-my-clever-fix webpage, plus I > have no access to my box at the moment... and you're right, it might be too > late now, although I did not check the changelog if there actually were any > changes in bf? There were some changes now. As said, I did not consider m68k ;) problems as hot problems since there are no "pending" bug reports, even no scarying bug reports at all. At least not here. > > Oh, and I won't work on BFs till the end of the week (exams), so if > > someone wants to make a new release ASAP, begin contacting the b-f > > building people, tell Joey to wait another 2 weeks, etc. etc. we _could_ > > use 2.4.19-bf2.4 for i386, but should we? > > In case anybody should be waiting for new kernels on m68k, don't... > > <no sarcasm>Good luck with your exams, they are of course more important! They are, believe me. If I do not get it in this and in the next term, I am completely fscked up. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Zum 1.000.001. Mal: Jedes Programm, das kompliziertere Funktionen bietet als Space Invaders verlangt eine 'zeitraubende intensive Einarbeitung' wenn man es vernünftig nutzen möchte. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
