* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-05 13:49]:
> It would be good to be able to choose between partman and partconf
> by subarchitecture.
Colin suggested to use isinstallable for this. If some (but not all)
sub-arches of an arch use partman, make partman the default but have
an isinstallable scrip
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting VEROK Istvan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> I echo the same sentiment. In my Hungarian translation of the "wizard"
>> strings, I used something like "partitioning helped by the Wizard" or
>> "partitioning guided by the Wizard".
>
> The french translation uses the c
Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:46:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>>
>> We do have a beta3 branch in the repo, but it's acting more like a tag,
>> I guess, no changes have been made to it.
>>
>> I tried the new partman, and it works great. Wow, that's a lot of work!
>> My only q
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting VEROK Istvan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > I echo the same sentiment. In my Hungarian translation of the "wizard"
> > strings, I used something like "partitioning helped by the Wizard" or
> > "partitioning guided by the Wizard".
>
> The french translation uses the
Quoting VEROK Istvan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I echo the same sentiment. In my Hungarian translation of the "wizard"
> strings, I used something like "partitioning helped by the Wizard" or
> "partitioning guided by the Wizard".
The french translation uses the commonly accepted word of "Assistant"
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 06:06, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On a system that I've already got an operating system installed on, that I
> really, really would prefer not to hose, I'm going to fear and distrust
> anything that uses the words "Automatic" and "Partition" together, and
> choose some other
> On a system that I've already got an operating system installed on, that I
> really, really would prefer not to hose, I'm going to fear and distrust
> anything that uses the words "Automatic" and "Partition" together, and
> choose some other option that implies I have more control over whether o
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:06:50PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:46:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > We do have a beta3 branch in the repo, but it's acting more like a tag,
> > I guess, no changes have been made to it.
> >
> > I tried the new partman, and it works
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:46:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> We do have a beta3 branch in the repo, but it's acting more like a tag,
> I guess, no changes have been made to it.
>
> I tried the new partman, and it works great. Wow, that's a lot of work!
> My only quibble is with the use of the t
* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-06 23:42]:
> > Wizard to partition". I don't think wizard is a proper noun, so should
> > not be capitalised, and I don't see how this is better than the old
> > "Automatically partition". It assumes that the user is familiar with
> > windows wizard-t
Joey Hess wrote:
> I tried the new partman, and it works great. Wow, that's a lot of work!
> My only quibble is with the use of the term Wizard, as in "Use the
> Wizard to partition". I don't think wizard is a proper noun, so should
> not be capitalised, and I don't see how this is better than the
* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-06 23:41]:
> > It doesn't support acorn labels (acorn-fdisk does). However, all
> > currently supported ARM subarches use msdos labels, so ARM is not
> > using partman.
> Oh-kay. That's confusing. Do you mean "so ARM is using partman"?
s/not/now/,
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 5.IV.2004 at 01:08 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>>
>> > Eeeww... why was this? I remember partman/libparted had trouble
>> > making DVH disklabels... was that the only reason for MIPS?
>
> There is also a problem with the numbering of the partitions (#238838,
> #220990). I h
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-05 15:31]:
>> > Lack of support for several arm subarch partitioning schemes.
>>
>> So far I (and probably the maintainers of parted also) have no info
>> about this. :-(
>
> It doesn't support acorn labels (acorn-fdisk does
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 5.IV.2004 at 12:44 Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > If we're in a string freeze, it's news to me. (Ahemm..)
>
> OK. Then today or tomorow I am commiting the changes.
>
> I supposed that I had to wait for a new branch in the repository just
> like this happened with beta2
>
On 5.IV.2004 at 12:44 Joey Hess wrote:
>
> If we're in a string freeze, it's news to me. (Ahemm..)
OK. Then today or tomorow I am commiting the changes.
I supposed that I had to wait for a new branch in the repository just
like this happened with beta2
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> There is also a problem with the numbering of the partitions (#238838,
> #220990). I have fixed it in partman (though I am holding my commits
> because of the string freeze).
If we're in a string freeze, it's news to me. (Ahemm..)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Descriptio
m68k also still needs partitioner/partconf because atari isn't supported
by parted yet (bts #239816). (Now how to only use partitioner/partconf
on atari )
partman is pretty slow too (on m68k), but I think it's the way to go.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it ri
* Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-05 15:31]:
> > Lack of support for several arm subarch partitioning schemes.
>
> So far I (and probably the maintainers of parted also) have no info
> about this. :-(
It doesn't support acorn labels (acorn-fdisk does). However, all
currently supporte
On 5.IV.2004 at 01:08 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > Eeeww... why was this? I remember partman/libparted had trouble
> > making DVH disklabels... was that the only reason for MIPS?
There is also a problem with the numbering of the partitions (#238838,
#220990). I have fixed it in partman (though I
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello d-i peoples,
> >>
> >> since we have partman now, I'm wondering if it is time to remove some
> >> unused packages from the archive. This will reduce the size of available
> >> packages for d-i and makes m
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Thorsten Sauter wrote:
>>
>> Hello d-i peoples,
>>
>> since we have partman now, I'm wondering if it is time to remove some
>> unused packages from the archive. This will reduce the size of available
>> packages for d-i and makes my bugs list smaller. :-)
>>
>> I have an
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > However, are its templates really used? They give translators a lot of
> > work.
>
> Yes, it appears on the partman menu and has a lot of screens under that.
OK, so we don't do work for nothing..:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > I have an eye on the following packages:
> > > - lvmcfg
> >
> > A dependency of partman-lvm at least until that package is redone.
>
> However, are its templates really used? They give translators a lot of
> work.
Yes,
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I have an eye on the following packages:
> > - lvmcfg
>
> A dependency of partman-lvm at least until that package is redone.
However, are its templates really used? They give translators a lot of
work.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
[Thorsten Sauter] wrote:
> I'm wondering if it is time to remove some unused packages from the
> archive.
The packages discover2 and discover2-data (and ther udebs) should be
removed from the archive.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello d-i peoples,
>
> since we have partman now, I'm wondering if it is time to remove some
> unused packages from the archive. This will reduce the size of available
> packages for d-i and makes my bugs list smaller. :-)
>
> I have an eye on the fo
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> since we have partman now, I'm wondering if it is time to remove some
> unused packages from the archive. This will reduce the size of available
> packages for d-i and makes my bugs list smaller. :-)
>
> I have an eye on the following packages:
> - lvmcfg
A dependen
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
>
> Hello d-i peoples,
>
> since we have partman now, I'm wondering if it is time to remove some
> unused packages from the archive. This will reduce the size of available
> packages for d-i and makes my bugs list smaller. :-)
>
> I have an eye on the following packages:
>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 11:50:35PM +0200, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
>
> Hello d-i peoples,
>
> since we have partman now, I'm wondering if it is time to remove some
> unused packages from the archive. This will reduce the size of available
> packages for d-i and makes my bugs list smaller. :-)
>
>
* Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-30 23:50]:
> I have an eye on the following packages:
> - lvmcfg
> - partconf
> - partitioner
> All of them are replaced by partman (and most of them are simply to
> buggy to keep in the archive).
partconf is still used by some archi
Hello d-i peoples,
since we have partman now, I'm wondering if it is time to remove some
unused packages from the archive. This will reduce the size of available
packages for d-i and makes my bugs list smaller. :-)
I have an eye on the following packages:
- lvmcfg
- partconf
32 matches
Mail list logo
