Anton Zinoviev wrote:

> On  5.IV.2004 at 01:08 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>>
>> > Eeeww... why was this?  I remember partman/libparted had trouble
>> > making DVH disklabels... was that the only reason for MIPS?
> 
> There is also a problem with the numbering of the partitions (#238838,
> #220990).  I have fixed it in partman (though I am holding my commits
> because of the string freeze).  I suppose that in the next release of
> the installer partconf will not be necessary on mips, but partitioner
> will.
That would definitely be an improvement, anyway.  If we can kill partconf,
keeping partioner isn't quite so bad.

> 
>> > What's the problem for arm?
>> 
>> Lack of support for several arm subarch partitioning schemes.
> 
> So far I (and probably the maintainers of parted also) have no info
> about this. :-(
> 
> Anton Zinoviev

-- 
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to