Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On 5.IV.2004 at 01:08 Thiemo Seufer wrote: >> >> > Eeeww... why was this? I remember partman/libparted had trouble >> > making DVH disklabels... was that the only reason for MIPS? > > There is also a problem with the numbering of the partitions (#238838, > #220990). I have fixed it in partman (though I am holding my commits > because of the string freeze). I suppose that in the next release of > the installer partconf will not be necessary on mips, but partitioner > will. That would definitely be an improvement, anyway. If we can kill partconf, keeping partioner isn't quite so bad.
> >> > What's the problem for arm? >> >> Lack of support for several arm subarch partitioning schemes. > > So far I (and probably the maintainers of parted also) have no info > about this. :-( > > Anton Zinoviev -- Make sure your vote will count. http://www.verifiedvoting.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]