Re: potato boot-floppies

2000-06-21 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:41:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > I'm okay with being a little laggy with boot-floppies, especially if m68k > is okay for release, since I'm working on the assumption that m68k'll > take the most time to build and upload. Did you send the list of required packages to

Re: potato boot-floppies

2000-06-21 Thread peter karlsson
Joerg Friedrich: > But this leeds into serious problems if a third party bootloader is used, > i.e. IBM (OS/2) Bootloader, Powerquest Bootmagic (comes with Partition > Magic) Yes, this was the most annoying thing I found when I installed Debian on my two machines, it simply wouldn't place LILO a

Re: potato boot-floppies

2000-06-20 Thread Randolph Chung
> I think we wait to tausq to upload -compact and -idepci flavor and for > corresponding pcmcia packages. And b-f has to be updatet for 2.2.16 i'll do that in the next couple of days. i think it's kinda poetic that we have 2.2.16 b-f and 2.2.16 boot-floppies... :-) randolph -- Debian Developer

Re: potato boot-floppies

2000-06-20 Thread Joerg Friedrich
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Petr Cech wrote: > > * #64823: incorrect LILO automatic placement on i386; 22 days old > > I think the subject is missleading. It only doesn't want to put LILO into > extended partition. Let's call it a feature :) But this leeds into serious problems if a third party bo

Re: potato boot-floppies

2000-06-20 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 03:39:34PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: > I think we wait to tausq to upload -compact and -idepci flavor and for > corresponding pcmcia packages. And b-f has to be updatet for 2.2.16 Okay, assuming all that was pretty much correct and indicative, we should have all the source u

Re: potato boot-floppies

2000-06-20 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 09:55:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > ? Or are these not really RC? (If the latter, please downgrade them > appropriately) > > Basically, what I'm asking is, as far as source is concerned, are you > ready to go? I realise you need to wait for updated base packages befor

Re: potato boot-floppies

2000-06-20 Thread Petr Cech
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 09:55:31PM +1000 , Anthony Towns wrote: > Hello world, > > Congratulations guys: -testing seems to hold nothing but praise for potato > upgrades, looks good. cool > Is there anything more you're intending to do to b-f for potato, > beyond 2.2.15? Alternately, do whatever