Re: deb install report

2004-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
James J. Ramsey wrote: > ide=nodma is not a module parameter per se, AFAICT. > Judging from the release notes of Red Hat 8.0 > , > the parameter passed to the ide-cd module to disable > DMA (which is disabled by default in

Re: deb install report

2004-01-04 Thread James J. Ramsey
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James J. Ramsey wrote: > The > installer > > seems to filter out some of the parameters that > are > > passed at the boot prompt, even though they are > > standard-issue, documented kernel parameters. In > > B?r?ny's case, the ignored parameter was > vga=

Re: deb install report

2004-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
James J. Ramsey wrote: > It may be old, but I think that even the recent builds > seem to have a bug that affected B?r?ny. The installer > seems to filter out some of the parameters that are > passed at the boot prompt, even though they are > standard-issue, documented kernel parameters. In > B?r?n

Re: deb install report

2004-01-04 Thread James J. Ramsey
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sándor Bárány wrote: > "After the hardware detection, the install loads the > frame buffer module (even there was a vga=normal > parameter specified on the kernel line), which fails > (the hardware is so old, there is no frame buffer > support). This

Re: deb install report

2004-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
Sándor Bárány wrote: > Debian-installer-version: > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-i386/20040102/images/hd-media-image.img.gz > sarge-i386-netinst-iso from a mirror of the November 11th version That's very old, and it would be better to use the daily builds. In part