Hi Jeff,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:33:31PM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 20:23, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> > And for discover1, there is a patch that apparently works to allow
> > discover1 to work with 2.6.
>
> I've been using the "modprobe -n" solution proposed in #223682 f
Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
Erich Waelde a écrit :
please add
- raidsupport
the md-modules are already available (used by the lvm-stuff), and
should be useful without further modification I think. So that
would need a raidtools2 udeb or similar and a config dialog to
create /e
Erich Waelde a écrit :
please add
- raidsupport
the md-modules are already available (used by the lvm-stuff), and
should be useful without further modification I think. So that
would need a raidtools2 udeb or similar and a config dialog to
create /etc/raidtools.
ok,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:21:15AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > In a sense we're not done with beta2 yet, since we have between 1 and
> > 2.5 architectures that are still in positions to possibly be added to
> > the beta in a week or two. At the same time, I am eager to open unstable
> > back up
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 05:13:11PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:01:06PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I notice that lots of people here and elsewhere are talking as if
> > sarge's release is fairly imminant. I must have missed a message from aj
> > giving a projected date;
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:57:29AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I don't know if the Menu-Item-Number stuff can vary by architecture. I
> think it can, with some difficulty.
Not yet.
Bastian
--
Beam me up, Scotty!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:02:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > A new linux-kernel-di upload is needed tomorrow, after my -5 kernels
> > enter the archive, i missed the deadline yesterday. They add support for
> > old world pmac, as tested by Jeremie Koenig, and the pegasos RTC
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:57:29AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > A related question, will the partitioner preferences be decided on a
> > per-architecture basis? There are special considerations on some
> > architectures (e.g., BSD disklabels on alpha, GPT on ia64?) that need
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:01:06PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I notice that lots of people here and elsewhere are talking as if
> sarge's release is fairly imminant. I must have missed a message from aj
> giving a projected date; what's up?
If we foster that attitude then it has a much better chanc
Sven Luther wrote:
> A new linux-kernel-di upload is needed tomorrow, after my -5 kernels
> enter the archive, i missed the deadline yesterday. They add support for
> old world pmac, as tested by Jeremie Koenig, and the pegasos RTC fix.
I think I'll get this in today.
> Also, is it ok, if in my n
David Nusinow wrote:
> Are we really planning to switch over to discover2 for the release!?!
> Switching a mature and well tested package for a brand new one this
> close to release would be bad, and I hope I'm not the only one who
> thinks this.
Part of the reason I posted that long list is becau
Steve Langasek wrote:
> A related question, will the partitioner preferences be decided on a
> per-architecture basis? There are special considerations on some
> architectures (e.g., BSD disklabels on alpha, GPT on ia64?) that need to
> be taken into account before partman can serve as a reasonabl
fre 2004-01-16 klockan 07.04 skrev Christian Perrier:
> > See the item about subversion.. ;-)
>
>
> Hmmm ? I can't say that I'm in favour of it.I've just started to
> learn the CVS basics so switching to something else fears me a bit
> (old people fear changes, you know..:-)))
I've used CVS
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 07:04:08AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > However, I find its location in the CVS tree quite strange. Why isn't
> > > it under tools? Seems a pretty minor problem but this needs to be
> > > fixed, i
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:02:16PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:24:05AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > - partman
> > > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with
> > > a menu item that makes it non-default (like autopartkit) until
> > >
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 07:04:08AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > > - partman
> > > > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with
> > > > a menu item that makes it non-default (like au
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:55:48PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:33:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > - a manual
> > Seems to be making progress, but needs to make more progress.
>
> Should "how to customize d-i" be a part of this?
Definitely.
At least how t
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > - partman
> > > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with
> > > a menu item that makes it non-default (like autopartkit) until
> > > we're comfortable with it. Since it meets requirement I., it can
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:24:05AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > - partman
> > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with
> > a menu item that makes it non-default (like autopartkit) until
> > we're comfortable with it. Since it meets requirement I., it can
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:54:08AM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> | - XFS
> | Could happen a number of ways, either as an alternate boot on
> | the CDs, or by XFS finally being added to stock 2.4.25/6, or by
> | d-i getting support for 2.6. I'm sure that Steve will come up
> | wi
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 20:23, David Nusinow wrote:
> And for discover1, there is a patch that apparently works to allow
> discover1 to work with 2.6.
I've been using the "modprobe -n" solution proposed in #223682 for a
couple weeks now and it's been working well.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I never kn
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:35:26PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I request you to make an exception for discover as the next upload
> should have no impact on d-i and fixes quite important bugs in the deb.
> We might delay the next discover-data upload some day as this is more or
> less cosmetic
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:54:08AM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-15 04:33]:
> | I've gone ahead and started the beta 2 release process. CD images are in
> | place and I will send out the release announcement once the web site has
> | updated. (Some install
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:33:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I've gone ahead and started the beta 2 release process. CD images are in
> place and I will send out the release announcement once the web site has
> updated. (Some install media won't appear in sarge until tomorrow's
> dinstall.)
>
> I
Am Don, den 15.01.2004 schrieb Joey Hess um 04:33:
> I've gone ahead and started the beta 2 release process. CD images are in
> place and I will send out the release announcement once the web site has
> updated. (Some install media won't appear in sarge until tomorrow's
> dinstall.)
>
OK, beta2 is
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> | - XFS
> | Could happen a number of ways, either as an alternate boot on
> | the CDs, or by XFS finally being added to stock 2.4.25/6, or by
> | d-i getting support for 2.6. I'm sure that Steve will come up
> | with something.
>
> please do not use a diff
Christian Perrier wrote:
> > - partman
> > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with
> > a menu item that makes it non-default (like autopartkit) until
> > we're comfortable with it. Since it meets requirement I., it can
> > go in soon.
>
> However, I find i
please add
- raidsupport
the md-modules are already available (used by the lvm-stuff), and
should be useful without further modification I think. So that
would need a raidtools2 udeb or similar and a config dialog to
create /etc/raidtools.
ok, it's one of my favo
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:33:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> - a manual
> Seems to be making progress, but needs to make more progress.
Should "how to customize d-i" be a part of this?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I've gone ahead and started the beta 2 release process. CD images are in
Great work, great summary, great everything...As usual..:-)
> - partman
> Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with
> a menu item that makes it no
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-15 04:33]:
| I've gone ahead and started the beta 2 release process. CD images are in
| place and I will send out the release announcement once the web site has
| updated. (Some install media won't appear in sarge until tomorrow's
| dinstall.)
yeah!! :-)
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks summarize, Joey.
At 15 Jan 04 03:33:57 GMT,
Joey Hess wrote:
> - better i18n in the second stage
> We need to work out something in base-config that works as well
> as d-i does for all our supported languages. Kensi has some
>
I wrote:
> In a sense we're not done with beta2 yet, since we have between 1 and
> 2.5 architectures that are still in positions to possibly be added to
> the beta in a week or two. At the same time, I am eager to open unstable
> back up to continued development especially with so many improvements
33 matches
Mail list logo