Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-17 Thread David Nusinow
Hi Jeff, On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:33:31PM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 20:23, David Nusinow wrote: > > > And for discover1, there is a patch that apparently works to allow > > discover1 to work with 2.6. > > I've been using the "modprobe -n" solution proposed in #223682 f

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Stuart Sheldon
Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote: Erich Waelde a écrit : please add - raidsupport the md-modules are already available (used by the lvm-stuff), and should be useful without further modification I think. So that would need a raidtools2 udeb or similar and a config dialog to create /e

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Fabrice Lorrain (home)
Erich Waelde a écrit : please add - raidsupport the md-modules are already available (used by the lvm-stuff), and should be useful without further modification I think. So that would need a raidtools2 udeb or similar and a config dialog to create /etc/raidtools. ok,

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:21:15AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > In a sense we're not done with beta2 yet, since we have between 1 and > > 2.5 architectures that are still in positions to possibly be added to > > the beta in a week or two. At the same time, I am eager to open unstable > > back up

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 05:13:11PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:01:06PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > I notice that lots of people here and elsewhere are talking as if > > sarge's release is fairly imminant. I must have missed a message from aj > > giving a projected date;

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:57:29AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > I don't know if the Menu-Item-Number stuff can vary by architecture. I > think it can, with some difficulty. Not yet. Bastian -- Beam me up, Scotty! signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:02:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > A new linux-kernel-di upload is needed tomorrow, after my -5 kernels > > enter the archive, i missed the deadline yesterday. They add support for > > old world pmac, as tested by Jeremie Koenig, and the pegasos RTC

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:57:29AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > A related question, will the partitioner preferences be decided on a > > per-architecture basis? There are special considerations on some > > architectures (e.g., BSD disklabels on alpha, GPT on ia64?) that need

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:01:06PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > I notice that lots of people here and elsewhere are talking as if > sarge's release is fairly imminant. I must have missed a message from aj > giving a projected date; what's up? If we foster that attitude then it has a much better chanc

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Joey Hess
Sven Luther wrote: > A new linux-kernel-di upload is needed tomorrow, after my -5 kernels > enter the archive, i missed the deadline yesterday. They add support for > old world pmac, as tested by Jeremie Koenig, and the pegasos RTC fix. I think I'll get this in today. > Also, is it ok, if in my n

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Joey Hess
David Nusinow wrote: > Are we really planning to switch over to discover2 for the release!?! > Switching a mature and well tested package for a brand new one this > close to release would be bad, and I hope I'm not the only one who > thinks this. Part of the reason I posted that long list is becau

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Joey Hess
Steve Langasek wrote: > A related question, will the partitioner preferences be decided on a > per-architecture basis? There are special considerations on some > architectures (e.g., BSD disklabels on alpha, GPT on ia64?) that need to > be taken into account before partman can serve as a reasonabl

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Martin Sjögren
fre 2004-01-16 klockan 07.04 skrev Christian Perrier: > > See the item about subversion.. ;-) > > > Hmmm ? I can't say that I'm in favour of it.I've just started to > learn the CVS basics so switching to something else fears me a bit > (old people fear changes, you know..:-))) I've used CVS

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 07:04:08AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Christian Perrier wrote: > > > However, I find its location in the CVS tree quite strange. Why isn't > > > it under tools? Seems a pretty minor problem but this needs to be > > > fixed, i

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:02:16PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:24:05AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > - partman > > > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with > > > a menu item that makes it non-default (like autopartkit) until > > >

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 07:04:08AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > - partman > > > > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with > > > > a menu item that makes it non-default (like au

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Miroslav Kure
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:55:48PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:33:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > - a manual > > Seems to be making progress, but needs to make more progress. > > Should "how to customize d-i" be a part of this? Definitely. At least how t

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Christian Perrier wrote: > > > - partman > > > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with > > > a menu item that makes it non-default (like autopartkit) until > > > we're comfortable with it. Since it meets requirement I., it can

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:24:05AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > - partman > > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with > > a menu item that makes it non-default (like autopartkit) until > > we're comfortable with it. Since it meets requirement I., it can

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:54:08AM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote: > | - XFS > | Could happen a number of ways, either as an alternate boot on > | the CDs, or by XFS finally being added to stock 2.4.25/6, or by > | d-i getting support for 2.6. I'm sure that Steve will come up > | wi

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-15 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 20:23, David Nusinow wrote: > And for discover1, there is a patch that apparently works to allow > discover1 to work with 2.6. I've been using the "modprobe -n" solution proposed in #223682 for a couple weeks now and it's been working well. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- I never kn

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-15 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:35:26PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > I request you to make an exception for discover as the next upload > should have no impact on d-i and fixes quite important bugs in the deb. > We might delay the next discover-data upload some day as this is more or > less cosmetic

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:54:08AM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote: > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-15 04:33]: > | I've gone ahead and started the beta 2 release process. CD images are in > | place and I will send out the release announcement once the web site has > | updated. (Some install

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:33:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > I've gone ahead and started the beta 2 release process. CD images are in > place and I will send out the release announcement once the web site has > updated. (Some install media won't appear in sarge until tomorrow's > dinstall.) > > I

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-15 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Am Don, den 15.01.2004 schrieb Joey Hess um 04:33: > I've gone ahead and started the beta 2 release process. CD images are in > place and I will send out the release announcement once the web site has > updated. (Some install media won't appear in sarge until tomorrow's > dinstall.) > OK, beta2 is

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-15 Thread Joey Hess
Thorsten Sauter wrote: > | - XFS > | Could happen a number of ways, either as an alternate boot on > | the CDs, or by XFS finally being added to stock 2.4.25/6, or by > | d-i getting support for 2.6. I'm sure that Steve will come up > | with something. > > please do not use a diff

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-15 Thread Joey Hess
Christian Perrier wrote: > > - partman > > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with > > a menu item that makes it non-default (like autopartkit) until > > we're comfortable with it. Since it meets requirement I., it can > > go in soon. > > However, I find i

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-15 Thread Erich Waelde
please add - raidsupport the md-modules are already available (used by the lvm-stuff), and should be useful without further modification I think. So that would need a raidtools2 udeb or similar and a config dialog to create /etc/raidtools. ok, it's one of my favo

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-15 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:33:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > - a manual > Seems to be making progress, but needs to make more progress. Should "how to customize d-i" be a part of this? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-15 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I've gone ahead and started the beta 2 release process. CD images are in Great work, great summary, great everything...As usual..:-) > - partman > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with > a menu item that makes it no

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-14 Thread Thorsten Sauter
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-15 04:33]: | I've gone ahead and started the beta 2 release process. CD images are in | place and I will send out the release announcement once the web site has | updated. (Some install media won't appear in sarge until tomorrow's | dinstall.) yeah!! :-) |

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-14 Thread Kenshi Muto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks summarize, Joey. At 15 Jan 04 03:33:57 GMT, Joey Hess wrote: > - better i18n in the second stage > We need to work out something in base-config that works as well > as d-i does for all our supported languages. Kensi has some >

Re: beta 2 and beyond

2004-01-14 Thread Joey Hess
I wrote: > In a sense we're not done with beta2 yet, since we have between 1 and > 2.5 architectures that are still in positions to possibly be added to > the beta in a week or two. At the same time, I am eager to open unstable > back up to continued development especially with so many improvements