Cyril Brulebois (2013-08-22):
> I'm very much tempted to upload partman-zfs 25 as partman-zfs 27, and
> call it a day. Broken partitioning is a very serious issue; ditto for
> depending on something that doesn't exist.
I've just reverted the commit on top of current master. Since I wasn't
sure ho
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> so we've got already #720442 and #720450 against partman-zfs, breaking
> partitioning, but also that:
> partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfsutils-udeb (>= 0.6.1)
> partman-zfs/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: zfs-modules
> partman-zfs/am
2 matches
Mail list logo
