Hi all,
I have problem with graphic debian squeeze installer and encrypt
partitions. I din't try text version yet.
I choose manual, then create some partitions on disk, set ext4,
mountpoint / or /home, then back to menu and choose encrypt (it's 4th
line from the top - under lvm, under is lis
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 09:33:06AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Joeyh, do you seriously think we can release this year yet (as in the next 4
> > weeks) ? I don't think there is time for this even if t-p-u was fixed
> > today. I
>
> I'm sure Joe
Quoting Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Joeyh, do you seriously think we can release this year yet (as in the next 4
> weeks) ? I don't think there is time for this even if t-p-u was fixed today. I
I'm sure Joey thinks we can release this year, yes. So do I.
By "release" and "we", I think bot
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:39:49PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > That said, if we had done the change in august, then we would not have this
> > problem anymore now, so the whole discussion comes down to if we will
> > release
> > this year yet (highly unlikely), or 6 or more on
Sven Luther wrote:
> That said, if we had done the change in august, then we would not have this
> problem anymore now, so the whole discussion comes down to if we will release
> this year yet (highly unlikely), or 6 or more onth from now.
I'm sorry, but I regard that attitude as such complete bul
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 06:34:55AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > That said, if we had done the change in august, then we would not have this
> > problem anymore now, so the whole discussion comes down to if we will
> > release
> > this year yet (highly unlikely), or 6 or more onth from no
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:31:43AM -0500, martin yazdzik wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> THe question I would like to have had answered, to wit, is the dual boot
> disk geometry problem solved, has been. Thanks.
>
> For the record, when using 2.6 to boot the cd, one sees that no matter
> what, when
> That said, if we had done the change in august, then we would not have this
> problem anymore now, so the whole discussion comes down to if we will release
> this year yet (highly unlikely), or 6 or more onth from now.
As a side remark in this thread, it would certainly be nice if we
don't rea
Dear Friends,
THe question I would like to have had answered, to wit, is the dual boot
disk geometry problem solved, has been. Thanks.
For the record, when using 2.6 to boot the cd, one sees that no matter
what, when checking the c,h,s before committing to the formatting, it
remains x,16,63, i
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:19:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, i don't really anticipate doing loads of parted 1.6.11 uploads anyway,
> > but i guess this is moot, since it seems there is a rough consensus among
> > the
> > RMs to get the experimental parted in sarge. Or
Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, i don't really anticipate doing loads of parted 1.6.11 uploads anyway,
> but i guess this is moot, since it seems there is a rough consensus among the
> RMs to get the experimental parted in sarge. Or at least try to do so.
>
> Unless you really like to reply to all the
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:58:53PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Why ? i can upload the experimental package to unstable, and it be used in
> > d-i, and if sarge fixes are needed upload them through t-p-u, no ?
>
> I think the release managers will tell you this is not a good i
Sven Luther wrote:
> Why ? i can upload the experimental package to unstable, and it be used in
> d-i, and if sarge fixes are needed upload them through t-p-u, no ?
I think the release managers will tell you this is not a good idea. See
kde's mounds of unfixed security holes in testing due to the
Steve Langasek wrote:
> It may be fixable by editing recipes-alpha/multi_user into something usable,
> but removing it would just fall back on the arch-neutral recipe, which is
> broken in other ways.
>
> I'm happy to fix up the alpha-specific multi_user recipe, if people can
> provide input as to
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:19:15PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> - Some problems with the CDs, I belive the amiga kernel is missing,
>there may be some other mising things.
> May or may not be fixed in debian-cd CVS. The amiga kernel fix
> was orignally commited to an automatically ge
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:00:45AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > partman-auto is arch: all, actually, which makes the alpha recipe breakage
> > more annoying to fix no matter which way you slice it.
> Ok, still it seems fixable by removing recipes-alpha/multi_user
It may be
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:19:15PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> - parted: Still frozen no matter what we do with d-i.
Why ? i can upload the experimental package to unstable, and it be used in
d-i, and if sarge fixes are needed upload them through t-p-u, no ?
I also believe that it was a mistake
> - upload to unstable
> Advantage: Easy, sid_d-i images will use them, fully autobuilt.
> Disadvantage: Any sarge fixes would have to go through t-p-u,
> which does not currently have a full set of autobuilders
> and is still not fully functional per the la
Steve Langasek wrote:
> partman-auto is arch: all, actually, which makes the alpha recipe breakage
> more annoying to fix no matter which way you slice it.
Ok, still it seems fixable by removing recipes-alpha/multi_user
> > If these are representative of the type of problems we'll be dealing
> >
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:19:15PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> - linux-kernel-di-: Upload to t-p-u, does not need autobuild,
> no problem.
> - debian-installer: We'd not upload development version of this
> even if unstable were open for developmental uploads, because it's
> only uplo
This thread died out without a conclusion and now that the svn
repository is branched, it's more urgent that we find a way to test
things in it. Here's a summary of the proposals, I've added updates
from the thread:
- upload to unstable
Advantage: Easy, sid_d-i images will use them, fully
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:41:38PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-22 18:00]:
> > in SVN. Can you please advise if 1) this is a good idea for sarge - I
> > take it from this message that the answer is clearly yes, and 2) if
> > anything is missing or should be
* Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-22 18:00]:
> in SVN. Can you please advise if 1) this is a good idea for sarge - I
> take it from this message that the answer is clearly yes, and 2) if
> anything is missing or should be omitted - the changelog should be
...
> Assuming the answers are 1) yes an
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 06:43:15AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> I think that I have been very clear on that topic
> with all new translators
This is good.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Joey,
On Thursday, 18 Nov 2004, you wrote:
> I agree, but the question to me is whether experimental is there yet.
> It seems to be autobuilt for alpha, hppa, powerpc, and sparc, BTW. Would
> all the other arches be happy with not having a development version of
> the installer available for an
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 03:56:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > Either rc2 is ready to be used for a debian release or
> > not; I happen to think it is.
>
> Rc2 is not under question. The question is whether there will be
> language updates in d-i
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:23:34PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 01:44:43AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > - upload to unstable
> > Advantage: Easy, sid_d-i images will use them, fully autobuilt.
> > Disadvantage: Any sarge fixes would have to go through t-p-u,
>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 03:56:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Either rc2 is ready to be used for a debian release or
> not; I happen to think it is.
Rc2 is not under question. The question is whether there will be
language updates in d-i before the release of sarge or not.
Anton Zinoviev
--
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> The upload to unstable is risky - it means that it will be difficult to
> make updates in rc2 if some need arises. Its not only the lack of
> autobuilders for t-p-u. T-p-u doesn't have its own distribution and
> daily built images and this means that the future changes in
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 01:44:43AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> - upload to unstable
> Advantage: Easy, sid_d-i images will use them, fully autobuilt.
> Disadvantage: Any sarge fixes would have to go through t-p-u,
> which does not currently have a full set of autobuilder
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-18 01:44]:
> Uploading post-sarge udebs to unstable seems like the best of these
> alternatives to me. Especially if we're sure that after rc2, d-i updates
> for sarge will be limited to security fixes, fixes for any base system
> breakage, and maybe discove
Hi,
At 18 Nov 04 06:44:43 GMT,
Joey Hess wrote:
> So it looks very much like the release will be this weekend. I've just
> committed a release-annoucement.txt to the usual place in the tree, and
> it could do with some fleshing out. I think that's all, other than
> updating the web site and gettin
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> As mentioned on IRC, I believe it would be inappropriate to add
> libfribidi0 to the base system at this stage, since this would be a
> significant change to a very important library (libslang). Fortunately,
> we can have d-i translated into Hebrew an
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 06:21:02PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> (copy to Alastair McKinstry as slang packages maintainer, Shlomi
> Loubaton as current worker on BIDI support for d-i and -boot as this
> concern comes from Debian Installer needs)
> > * As of now, no new packages will be added
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 06:21:02PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> (copy to Alastair McKinstry as slang packages maintainer, Shlomi
> Loubaton as current worker on BIDI support for d-i and -boot as this
> concern comes from Debian Installer needs)
>
> > * As of now, no new packages will be add
(copy to Alastair McKinstry as slang packages maintainer, Shlomi
Loubaton as current worker on BIDI support for d-i and -boot as this
concern comes from Debian Installer needs)
> * As of now, no new packages will be added to the base system. This
> means that packages in the base system *mus
36 matches
Mail list logo
