Hi, sorry for delay.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 24 Apr 2001 16:49:15 -0400,
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Mintha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any thoughts at what should be done? Can these be fixed, or should we
> > make a seperate slang-utf8 package?
As Edmund replie
Jim Mintha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any thoughts at what should be done? Can these be fixed, or should we
> make a seperate slang-utf8 package?
I always thought the plan was that we make a separate slang-utf8
package. If done intelligently, such a package doesn't even need to
conflict wit
Jim Mintha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There seem to be a whole bunch of problems with the utf8 slang
> packages. People are having trouble with slrn, lynx, etc. Possibly
> these packages just need to be recompiled but the following seems more
> serious:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 11:36:38PM +02
There seem to be a whole bunch of problems with the utf8 slang
packages. People are having trouble with slrn, lynx, etc. Possibly
these packages just need to be recompiled but the following seems more
serious:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 11:36:38PM +0200 , Jim Mintha wrote:
> > I just uploaded t
4 matches
Mail list logo
