Jim Mintha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any thoughts at what should be done? Can these be fixed, or should we
> make a seperate slang-utf8 package?
I always thought the plan was that we make a separate slang-utf8
package. If done intelligently, such a package doesn't even need to
conflict with the standard slang package (e.g., include files in a
different dir, shared library named differently).
Any packages we need for the boot-floppies rescue system would of
course have to be specifically built with these utf8 libs.
--
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
