On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 00:09:15 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Control: tag -1 -confirmed
>
> Michael Tokarev (2013-05-09):
> > Control: reopen -1
> >
> > 05.05.2013 12:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > > Control: retitle -1 pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
> >
> > Hmm. I didn't notice the bug has been
Control: tag -1 -confirmed
Michael Tokarev (2013-05-09):
> Control: reopen -1
>
> 05.05.2013 12:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > Control: retitle -1 pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
>
> Hmm. I didn't notice the bug has been closed...
> Reopening it (now re-titled as a pu), instead of
> submiting a new rep
Control: reopen -1
05.05.2013 12:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
Hmm. I didn't notice the bug has been closed...
Reopening it (now re-titled as a pu), instead of
submiting a new report, so that all the information
is in one place.
Thanks, and sorry for al
Control: retitle -1 pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
17.04.2013 22:54, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> tags 686502 + wheezy-ignore
> usertags 686502 + wheezy-can-defer
> thanks
>
> On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 09:51 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Michael Tokarev (08/04/20
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> tags 686502 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #686502 {Done: Michael Tokarev } [src:busybox] busybox
unxz silently fails to de
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
tags 686502 + wheezy-ignore
usertags 686502 + wheezy-can-defer
thanks
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 09:51 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Tokarev (08/04/2013):
> > > We're unlikely to met all the conditions for this bug in d-i or
> > > initramfs during
08.04.2013 11:57, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Forgot to mention one thing:
>
> Cyril Brulebois (08/04/2013):
>> My take is: until we hit real bugs in real situations, we keep busybox as it
>> is. If release managers want to cherry-pick a few fixes, I won't stop them
>> from requesting so. But as f
Forgot to mention one thing:
Cyril Brulebois (08/04/2013):
> My take is: until we hit real bugs in real situations, we keep busybox
> as it is. If release managers want to cherry-pick a few fixes, I won't
> stop them from requesting so. But as far as I'm concerned, I'd really
> like to see practi
Michael Tokarev (08/04/2013):
> I'm pinging this bug, as we're getting seriously out of time.
Well, if you had Cc'd the right people in the first place…
> > Let me start from scratch please. I wasn't aware of this
> > bugreport/discussion, and I made a mistake by not filing a proper
> > unblock
I'm pinging this bug, as we're getting seriously out of time.
Now, I guess, we should either let the whole thing go (it has
already been unblocked for, only d-i block remains), or mark
the relevant bugs as non-RC for wheezy.
Thanks,
/mjt
25.03.2013 15:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Let me start f
And sure thing I forgot to Cc debian-boot@. I think if this needs
to be discussed further, debian-boot@ should receive it too.
Thanks!
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: h
11 matches
Mail list logo
