user release.debian....@packages.debian.org tags 686502 + wheezy-ignore usertags 686502 + wheezy-can-defer thanks
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 09:51 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> (08/04/2013): > > > We're unlikely to met all the conditions for this bug in d-i or > > > initramfs during wheezy lifetime, -- _provided_ that some future > > > _wheeze_ update will not contain such concatenated xz streams > > > produced by, say, an improved version of dpkg (which utilizes > > > multiple cores for compression), -- but this is an unlikely > > > situation. > > Agreed, and unlikely means I'm not going to approve of such a chance > at this point. Based on the above, I think it's fair to say the changes aren't going to make wheezy r0. Maybe we could revisit some (or all) of the fixes for a point release? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1366224840.6483.12.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
