On Montag, 21. Juni 2004 16:18, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
>
> Ah, so you did pvcreate on it (or the installer did), then did mkfs
> over that? I can imagine that would have an odd effect on the LVM
> metadata!
The installer seems to have done that, yes. I thought the installer's
behavior was prett
On Montag, 21. Juni 2004 14:24, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> Hang on, there's an alarm bell that I've not been heeding.
>
> Looking in the code: "Incorrect metadata area header checksum" is a
> fatal error.
>
> If that's is occurring on one of tour PVs then the VG should not
> activate.that leads me
On Montag, 21. Juni 2004 08:22, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
>
> Well, if things seem to be working OK, I wouldn't worry too much
> about it! I would have expected vgchange to fail if the MDA
> checksums were wrong but it seems not.
>
> In the meantime can you send me a vgdisplay output and a
> pvdispl
On Freitag, 18. Juni 2004 18:12, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 05:54:38PM +0200, Matthias Murra wrote:
>
> You probably shouldn't need to reinstall. Upgrading the tools
> should either fix it automatically, or you can do
> vgcfgbackup/vgcfgrestore to rewrite the metadata.
I ha
4 matches
Mail list logo
