On 15.07.2012 17:37, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 15, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
>> Can you provide the number of the bugreport requesting removal of the
>> udeb? However, why is there a udeb called libkmod2-udeb then?
> It was discussed on IRC, I think with the busybox maintainer.
Well, if think it
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 16:33:26 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 15, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> > This is interesting, because the last time I tried statically linking
> > the udeb it was bigger than the dynamic one.
> And now I remembered: the udeb is not static because the current udev
> (w
On Jul 15, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> This is interesting, because the last time I tried statically linking
> the udeb it was bigger than the dynamic one.
And now I remembered: the udeb is not static because the current udev
(which I failed to package timely, and now may be too late for
wheezy...)
Mark Hymers (15/07/2012):
> At the release / boot team's request, the -udeb and source has been
> placed back in unstable for now. I've also re-opened the removal bug.
> Once d-i is properly transitioned to kmod, please let us know and
> we'll remove it from unstable again.
Thanks, appreciated.
On Sun, 15, Jul, 2012 at 03:09:46PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois spoke thus..
> Marco d'Itri (15/07/2012):
> > WTF are you talking about?
>
> Obviously: #681285
At the release / boot team's request, the -udeb and source has been
placed back in unstable for now. I've also re-opened the removal bug.
On
Marco d'Itri (15/07/2012):
> It was discussed on IRC, I think with the busybox maintainer.
Because of course the busybox maintainer (on IRC) is the right point of
contact for anything d-i related?
Hint: no.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 15:37:05 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 15, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > Can you provide the number of the bugreport requesting removal of the
> > udeb? However, why is there a udeb called libkmod2-udeb then?
> It was discussed on IRC, I think with the busybox maintain
On Jul 15, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Can you provide the number of the bugreport requesting removal of the
> udeb? However, why is there a udeb called libkmod2-udeb then?
It was discussed on IRC, I think with the busybox maintainer.
> > module-init-tools is not coming back, if d-i still needs somet
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 03:05:17PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> WTF are you talking about? We switched from module-init-tools to kmod
> months ago, and the last time I discussed d-i and modules with
> debian-boot people my understanding was that modules are now loaded by
> busybox.
Can you prov
Marco d'Itri (15/07/2012):
> WTF are you talking about?
Obviously: #681285
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi!
On 15.07.2012 14:59, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
thanks to the totally uncoordinated switch from module-init-tools to
kmod, d-i is badly broken. We're in freeze, neither debian-boot or
debian-release were contacted, that's a huge success!
Please unfuck this. And make sure you contact debian-boo
On Jul 15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> thanks to the totally uncoordinated switch from module-init-tools to
> kmod, d-i is badly broken. We're in freeze, neither debian-boot or
> debian-release were contacted, that's a huge success!
WTF are you talking about? We switched from module-init-tools to km
Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:36:31 -0600
CLIENT: 120-0377-950
Good day:
You must complete our form to finalize the process.
Our company can offer a deal 3.35% at this very moment.
We appreciate your business and look forward to following up with you.
Please visit our site
http://www.moreupto.com/
Ange
We received your email addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unfortunately, your email
address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], is not a registered email address on Emode Matchmaking.
Please check that the email address from which you are sending this message is the
same email address you registered with when you
The Hacker Antivirus encontró virus
en el mensaje :
Enviado por : [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para : / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox : Area Comercial
Asunto : Re: Thank you!
Fecha: 22/08/2003
Hora : 5:54:4 PM
-
Objeto : YOUR_DETAI
#include
David Kimdon wrote on Wed May 29, 2002 um 09:19:58PM:
> Wed, May 29, 2002 at 03:48:57PM -0700 wrote:
> > thank you for the last reply, now i got another
> > question i just finished downloading the debian iso
> > today. with jigdo is the current stable released iso
> > does the kernel wo
Wed, May 29, 2002 at 03:48:57PM -0700 wrote:
> thank you for the last reply, now i got another
> question i just finished downloading the debian iso
> today. with jigdo is the current stable released iso
> does the kernel work with hpt370 raid device?
I don't know.
> i was
> told the hpt370 is
17 matches
Mail list logo
