On Jul 15, Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> wrote: > Can you provide the number of the bugreport requesting removal of the > udeb? However, why is there a udeb called libkmod2-udeb then? It was discussed on IRC, I think with the busybox maintainer.
> > module-init-tools is not coming back, if d-i still needs something from > > kmod then just let me know without getting crazy for no reason. > http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/kmod.diff This is interesting, because the last time I tried statically linking the udeb it was bigger than the dynamic one. -Os is supposed to be used, but now I see that it somehow broke. I can upload a new package later today, but I want to be really sure that there is a consensus to rename the udeb right now. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
