On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 01:59:33PM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gleydson Mazioli da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-21 09:40]:
> > If isn't not added yet, the LVM 2.0 installer need to check if the
> > system has a OLD lvm system installed on it. Because the old
> > snapshots don't work wi
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 09:40:47AM -0300, Gleydson Mazioli da Silva wrote:
> The LVM howto ask to remove the old snapshots, but I'm also not sure about what
> could happen if
> the old snapshots were not removed.
Bad things happens. LVM 2 missreads the LVs on a VG, which contains
snapshots.
Bas
* Gleydson Mazioli da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-21 09:40]:
> If isn't not added yet, the LVM 2.0 installer need to check if the
> system has a OLD lvm system installed on it. Because the old
> snapshots don't work with new LVM structure (all other things are
> backward compatible). So, if
* Gleydson Mazioli da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-21 09:40]:
> If isn't not added yet, the LVM 2.0 installer need to check if the
> system has a OLD lvm system installed on it. Because the old
> snapshots don't work with new LVM structure (all other things are
> backward compatible). So, if
Hi,
If isn't not added yet, the LVM 2.0 installer need to check if the system has a OLD
lvm system installed
on it. Because the old snapshots don't work with new LVM structure (all other things
are backward
compatible). So, if the LVM is requested and LVM 1.0 is found, is better to show a
warn
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This adds _much_ better LVM supports. It fixes many bugs from beta4,
> fixes the broken LVM support under 2.6 and moves to LVM2. I've
> thoroughly tested these modules, as have some other people. (Note,
> the new lvm2-udeb is not needed, although it won't hurt. The new
I'm going away for a conference now for a few days, and it would be
good if some udebs could be pushed into testing in the meantime, so I
(and some other people I asked) can do an installation of testing when
I come back. All of these have been well-tested and should definitely
be part of rc1.
I
7 matches
Mail list logo
