On 5/22/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:58:22PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 5/22/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Having GTKDFB 2.8.17, whose DFB backend is much more stable than the old
> >> one found in GTKDFB 2.0.9, available as udeb ma
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:58:22PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 5/22/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Having GTKDFB 2.8.17, whose DFB backend is much more stable than the old
> >> one found in GTKDFB 2.0.9, available as udeb may allow Etch to be
> >> released with graphical front
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 5/22/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having GTKDFB 2.8.17, whose DFB backend is much more stable than the
old
> one found in GTKDFB 2.0.9, available as udeb may allow Etch to be
> released with graphical frontend enabled by default ?
I am not sure, i got t
On 5/22/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having GTKDFB 2.8.17, whose DFB backend is much more stable than the old
> one found in GTKDFB 2.0.9, available as udeb may allow Etch to be
> released with graphical frontend enabled by default ?
I am not sure, i got the impression that the d
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:43:10AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Hi
>
> I prepared a tarball [1] containing the DFB backend for GTK+, backported
> from GTK's CVS HEAD to 2.8.x, and a patchfile to compile GTK 2.8.17 with
> the DFB backend.
Hey, Attilio, this is great, thanks a lot for this
Hi
I prepared a tarball [1] containing the DFB backend for GTK+, backported
from GTK's CVS HEAD to 2.8.x, and a patchfile to compile GTK 2.8.17 with
the DFB backend.
The patchfile has been tested with GTK 2.8.17 from CVS, DirectFB 0.9.24
and and Cairo 1.1.6 built with DFB backend; produced GTK
6 matches
Mail list logo