On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:58:22PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote: > On 5/22/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Having GTKDFB 2.8.17, whose DFB backend is much more stable than the old > >> one found in GTKDFB 2.0.9, available as udeb may allow Etch to be > >> released with graphical frontend enabled by default ? > > > >I am not sure, i got the impression that the default choice was not due to > >this consideration, but more about the general maturity of it. > > I think that is not the case, iirc, the 2.8 was preffered for the > exact reason of not having to maintain two gtk trees. Every arch > except hurd has libgtk2.0-0 at 2.8.17 while 2.8.16 has migrated in > testing: > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libgtk2.0-0
Sure, but this is a gtk/gnome choice, i was refering to the d-i choice here. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
