Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-10 Thread Guillem Jover
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 01:57:23PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 10 April 2006 06:14, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Sure, feel free to upload and change the maintainer if it does not > > bother you (the udeb bug can be closed with your upload). > > OK. I have prepared the packages and am ready to

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 10 April 2006 06:14, Guillem Jover wrote: > Sure, feel free to upload and change the maintainer if it does not > bother you (the udeb bug can be closed with your upload). OK. I have prepared the packages and am ready to upload. However, I think you will have to upload first as otherwise

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-09 Thread Guillem Jover
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 12:56:36AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 08 April 2006 19:11, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I'll be uploading the new directfb after 2006-04-09 dinstall run. > > As libsysfs2 has migrated to testing already, there should be no > > problem related to this. In regard to dep

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-09 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 08 April 2006 19:11, Guillem Jover wrote: > I'll be uploading the new directfb after 2006-04-09 dinstall run. > As libsysfs2 has migrated to testing already, there should be no > problem related to this. In regard to dependent packages, Frans > reported that gtk+2.0-directfb does not bu

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-09 Thread John Maclean
Hey chaps. Please tell me if this is the wrong list but Machine:- IBM Thikpad T21 OS:- Debian Sarge Problems:- New installation, wiping existng data clean. Boot up message... /bin/sh: line 0: exec: /usr/sbin/termwrap: cannot execute: No execute: No such file or directory INIT: ld "1" respawnin

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-08 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi again, On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 04:33:15AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > directfb 0.9.24-1 is now in experimental. Please test it and report any > problems. I will not move it to unstable for at least a week (plus the > time RMs may need due to other transitions, etc). I'll send another mail > j

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-05 Thread Davide Viti
> > Davide, Attilio or Alastair: could one of you look into this? I've been too busy to run my tests and I won't be able at least until next week, sorry. > I hope i'll find some time to post the report this evening (DFB 0.9.25 > is going to be released this week). FYI here's Denis announcement:

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 03 April 2006 03:33, Guillem Jover wrote: > >>directfb 0.9.24-1 is now in experimental. Please test it and report any >>problems. I will not move it to unstable for at least a week (plus the >>time RMs may need due to other transitions, etc). I'll send another >>mail

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-05 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 03 April 2006 03:33, Guillem Jover wrote: > directfb 0.9.24-1 is now in experimental. Please test it and report any > problems. I will not move it to unstable for at least a week (plus the > time RMs may need due to other transitions, etc). I'll send another > mail just 2 days before uplo

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:56, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > Will the libsysfs1 packages, and especially the udebs, remain > > available in testing after all regular binaries that depend on it > > have been rebuilt against libsysfs2? > > No,

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:21, Steve Langasek wrote: > > As discussed on IRC, directfb is tied into the libsysfs ABI transition, > > so please don't upload before that transition is completed in testing. > Will the libsysfs1 packages,

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:21, Steve Langasek wrote: > As discussed on IRC, directfb is tied into the libsysfs ABI transition, > so please don't upload before that transition is completed in testing. Will the libsysfs1 packages, and especially the udebs, remain available in testing after all re

Re: New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 04:33:15AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > directfb 0.9.24-1 is now in experimental. Please test it and report any > problems. I will not move it to unstable for at least a week (plus the > time RMs may need due to other transitions, etc). I'll send another mail > just 2 days

New directfb 0.9.24-1 with soname bumped

2006-04-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, directfb 0.9.24-1 is now in experimental. Please test it and report any problems. I will not move it to unstable for at least a week (plus the time RMs may need due to other transitions, etc). I'll send another mail just 2 days before uploading. For the RMs, when would it be fine with you to