On 22/11/2023 at 00:54, y...@vienna.at wrote:
I' m afraid I have to read much more about d-i
Especially partitioning.
But where to start?
The debian-installer package contains some documentation (maybe
incomplete and outdated) about partman, the d-i partitioning tool.
But I do not see the rel
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:12:31 +0100
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
I' m afraid I have to read much more about d-i
Especially partitioning.
But where to start?
Ciao
On 21/11/2023 at 21:35, Danny van Heumen wrote:
I noticed that the mount-configuration in `/etc/fstab`, by default, relies on
an *implicit* assumption for the ownership of the ESP to /boot/efi, i.e.
'root' (uid 0) only because it is executed as part of the boot process.
There is no implicit
Hi,
I will look into this setting. Thanks for pointing this out.
Now, to rewind to the original question, because my use case distracts from my
question:
I noticed that the mount-configuration in `/etc/fstab`, by default, relies on
an *implicit* assumption for the ownership of the ESP to /boot
[ Argh, please turn off the crappy auto-encryption with your
protonmail setup. It's utterly pointless when discussion is going to
a mailing list too... ]
Hi Danny,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:20:31PM +, Danny van Heumen wrote:
>On Nov 21, 2023, 4:59 PM, Steve McIntyre < st...@einval.com> w
Hi, see in-line.
Original Message
On Nov 21, 2023, 4:59 PM, Steve McIntyre < st...@einval.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 03:16:42PM +, Danny van Heumen wrote: >Hi, >
>AFAICT, there was no follow-up to this. Does this mean that it is >preferred
that ownership is determi
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 03:16:42PM +, Danny van Heumen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>AFAICT, there was no follow-up to this. Does this mean that it is
>preferred that ownership is determined solely by the user who mounts
>the EFI partition?
In normal use, the EFI partition isn't mounted by a user. What are y
Hi,
AFAICT, there was no follow-up to this. Does this mean that it is preferred
that ownership is determined solely by the user who mounts the EFI partition?
Regards,
Danny
On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 03:07, Danny van Heumen
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Resending, as I forgot to reply to th
Hi,
Resending, as I forgot to reply to the list. Response in line.
On Thursday, 9 November 2023 at 20:52, Pascal Hambourg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/11/2023 at 17:36, Danny van Heumen wrote:
>
> > I recently discovered that `/boot/efi`, being a FAT parition, is mounted
> > with an implicit ow
Hi,
On 09/11/2023 at 17:36, Danny van Heumen wrote:
I recently discovered that `/boot/efi`, being a FAT parition, is mounted with
an implicit owner and group, because FAT cannot store permissions. For the
default use case, `/boot/efi` is mounted automatically during boot, so there is
little
Hi,
I recently discovered that `/boot/efi`, being a FAT parition, is mounted with
an implicit owner and group, because FAT cannot store permissions. For the
default use case, `/boot/efi` is mounted automatically during boot, so there is
little risk. With diffirent mount options, this may become
11 matches
Mail list logo
