Hi, see in-line. -------- Original Message -------- On Nov 21, 2023, 4:59 PM, Steve McIntyre < st...@einval.com> wrote: On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 03:16:42PM +0000, Danny van Heumen wrote: >Hi, > >AFAICT, there was no follow-up to this. Does this mean that it is >preferred that ownership is determined solely by the user who mounts >the EFI partition? In normal use, the EFI partition isn't mounted by a user. What are you trying to solve here?
I wanted to make the partition user-mountable such that I can mount it before upgrading packages. The partition would not be mounted by default. (`noauto,users`) Then I found out that it defaults to ownership of mounting users, which is not good. As I mentioned previously, I would argue that the ESP should always mount with owner 0, even if my use case/experiment itself is an outlier. I spotted my mistake, but was surprised by how owner is chosen (in such a case). Yes, even when using sudo this shouldn't be a problem, however the behavior does deviate from other filesystems which have their own permission bits therefore have "protection" (maybe a strong word) against this situation. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com < Aardvark> I dislike C++ to start with. C++11 just seems to be handing rope-creating factories for users to hang multiple instances of themselves.
