Bug#324446: marked as done (Failed while installing LILO because /boot was already mounted outside of the /target)

2007-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:47:11 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324446: fixed in lilo-installer 1.24 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: Re: Bug#283346: Installing LILO into LVM partition fails badly

2004-11-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 283346 lilo-installer Bug#283346: Installing LILO into LVM partition fails badly Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `lilo-installer'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#283346: Installing LILO into LVM partition fails badly

2004-11-28 Thread Thomas Hofer
I filed bug #283351 to inform the lilo maintainer about the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#283346: Installing LILO into LVM partition fails badly

2004-11-28 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 283346 lilo-installer thanks Reassigning this report to package lilo-installer. Thank you for your clear analysis. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#283346: Installing LILO into LVM partition fails badly

2004-11-28 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Thomas Hofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041128 12:55]: > What I did: I created a LVM partition on hda6 with a root and a home > partition inside. Because /boot is on the LVM, the installer defaults > to LILO. I decided to install LILO into hda6 (in order to chainload it > via another installation th

Bug#283346: Installing LILO into LVM partition fails badly

2004-11-28 Thread Thomas Hofer
Package: debian-installer Version: Sarge netinst RC2 What I did: I created a LVM partition on hda6 with a root and a home partition inside. Because /boot is on the LVM, the installer defaults to LILO. I decided to install LILO into hda6 (in order to chainload it via another installation that u

Bug#230977: marked as done ([i386] [20040202] [businesscard] error installing lilo)

2004-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#231807: marked as done ([i386] [20040102] [floppy] error installing lilo)

2004-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jul 2004 21:38:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Bug#231807: error installing lilo has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#75106: installing LILO on boot partition

2001-04-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It does give the user a choice, between the MBR of the first drive > on the boot partition bus (e.g., hda or sda) and the boot > partition (e.g., hda1 in my case). The description, however, is > inaccurate, in that it refers to the "root partition's boot

Bug#75106: installing LILO on boot partition

2001-04-12 Thread Nate Duehr
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 07:25:51AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > Nate Duehr said: > > It should give the user a choice with a recommendation towards the boot > > partition for newbies. (I use a commercial bootloader on a number of my > > machines and never put LILO in the MBR.) > > It does give the

Bug#75106: installing LILO on boot partition

2001-04-12 Thread Matt Kraai
Nate Duehr said: > It should give the user a choice with a recommendation towards the boot > partition for newbies. (I use a commercial bootloader on a number of my > machines and never put LILO in the MBR.) It does give the user a choice, between the MBR of the first drive on the boot partition

Bug#75106: installing LILO on boot partition

2001-04-12 Thread Nate Duehr
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 08:42:35PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > Howdy, > > This bug laments that dbootstrap presents the boot partition, > rather than the root partition, as the location for installing > LILO if they are different. I tried this on my machine, and LILO > was able

Bug#75106: installing LILO on boot partition

2001-04-11 Thread Matt Kraai
Howdy, This bug laments that dbootstrap presents the boot partition, rather than the root partition, as the location for installing LILO if they are different. I tried this on my machine, and LILO was able to boot from this setup just fine. So I think this bug report should be closed. That is

RE: Installing LILO.

2000-09-25 Thread Erwin Dondorp
Richard Swen scribbled: > Is there a way to install lilo on an NTFS partition? I'm not aware of any way to do this. But if your goal is to get a dual boot Linux/Windows NT machine, you might try the following: - Install Windows NT as usual - Install Linux as usual, do not install LILO as the MBR

Installing LILO.

2000-09-25 Thread Richard Swen
Is there a way to install lilo on an NTFS partition? Thank you, Richard Swen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]