That appears to have done it, about halfway through installing right now.
Will let you know if that changes.
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 7:21 AM Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi again Craig!
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 06:51:40PM -0600, Craig Norborg wrote:
> >I used software called "Rufus". screen cap
Hi again Craig!
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 06:51:40PM -0600, Craig Norborg wrote:
>I used software called "Rufus". screen cap below of the options. Same exact
>drive when I did it with Ubuntu.
Hmmm, that surprises me - Rufus normally works very well with our
images. Out of curiosity, could you pl
I used software called "Rufus". screen cap below of the options. Same
exact drive when I did it with Ubuntu.
[image: image.png]
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:29 PM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> Craig Norborg (2021-08-31):
> > Comments/Problems: I played around and could see the error
>
Hi Craig,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 06:05:25PM -0600, Craig Norborg wrote:
>
>Package: installation-reports
>
>Boot method: USB stick
>Image version:
>https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/i386/iso-dvd/debian-11.0.0-i386-DVD-1.iso
>Date: 8/31/21 5:50PM MST
>Machine: Dell Dimension 8400
>Proc
Hi Craig,
Craig Norborg (2021-08-31):
> Comments/Problems: I played around and could see the error
> "/install.i386/vmlinuz not found". Saw this in multiple places.
>
>and ideas you had during the initial install.> I was trying to
> bring up a friends old machine with a decent OS, so I
Your message dated Sun, 9 Aug 2020 14:33:51 +0200
with message-id <20200809143351.2a49bd0065010c3624d0d...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#967963: installation failure: rockpro64
has caused the Debian Bug report #967963,
regarding installation failure: rockpro64
to be marked as done.
Hi,
Forest wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:27:14 +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
> >It's updated now, so the current daily builds should work.
>
> Thank you!
>
> >Can you check /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/chosen/stdout-path
>
> It contains "serial2:150n8" which I suppose is the expected v
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:27:14 +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>It's updated now, so the current daily builds should work.
Thank you!
>Can you check /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/chosen/stdout-path
It contains "serial2:150n8" which I suppose is the expected value
(though maybe not the best choi
Your message dated Fri, 7 Aug 2020 23:44:04 +0200
with message-id <20200807234404.35e377ed8bc47c218bcf5...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 4
has caused the Debian Bug report #844519,
regarding Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure
to be
On 06/08/2020 03:04, Forest wrote:
I used the installer image from over a week ago, because d-i.debian.org has
no newer daily images.
That happens frequently, as when the kernel is updated in the archive
the installer sources have to be manually updated to build for/with the
new kernel. The o
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: SD card
Image version:
https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/arm64/20200727-02:25/netboot/SD-card-images/firmware.rockpro64-rk3399.img.gz
Date: 2020-08-05
Machine: RockPro64
Processor: Rockchip rk3399
Memory: 4GB
Partitions: /dev/mmcblk1p1
Output of lspc
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20190302-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I used
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20190302-5/arm64/iso-cd/debian-testing-arm64-netinst.iso
to install Debian Buster on a Pine A64 LTS board.
U-Boot currently does not support EFI variable a
In-line :-
On 26/04/2017, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> in-line :-
>
> On 25/04/2017, Baptiste Jammet wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>
> Hello,
>
>> Dixit shirish शिरीष, le 25/04/2017 :
>>
>>>My query is how to save installation report and send it in the
>>>instance when the installation is a failure. I know that
in-line :-
On 25/04/2017, Baptiste Jammet wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
> Dixit shirish शिरीष, le 25/04/2017 :
>
>>My query is how to save installation report and send it in the
>>instance when the installation is a failure. I know that details of
>>what worked or didn't is in the memory (RAM) but h
Hello,
Dixit shirish शिरीष, le 25/04/2017 :
>My query is how to save installation report and send it in the
>instance when the installation is a failure. I know that details of
>what worked or didn't is in the memory (RAM) but how to save it to usb
>disk/usb thumbdrive ? At times where I'm insta
Dear all,
There are two three queries I have but instead of bunching them
together, would try to get solutions or pointers by spelling them
individually.
Below is the first one -
1. Installation report on installation failure - At times when you are
installing Debian either on too new hardware
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:20:47 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Owen (2016-11-16):
> > Package: installation-reports
> >
> > Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure
> >
> > Boot method: netinst, both Alpha 8 and Daily Build
> > Im
Hi Michael,
Michael Owen (2016-11-16):
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure
>
> Boot method: netinst, both Alpha 8 and Daily Build
> Image version: Alpha 8
> Date: Multiple times, multiple machines, multiple drives
>
> Mac
Package: installation-reports
Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure
Boot method: netinst, both Alpha 8 and Daily Build
Image version: Alpha 8
Date: Multiple times, multiple machines, multiple drives
Machine: Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2K
Dell Inspiron 3847
Processor: Intel Core2 Duo 7800
Your message dated Fri, 08 May 2015 13:02:31 +0200
with message-id <1831348.ooWXSrhHnd@hipnos>
and subject line debian-installer-launcher: installation failure using italian
language
has caused the Debian Bug report #728711,
regarding debian-installer-launcher: installation failure using i
Package: debian-installer-launcher
Version: 17
Severity: important
Tags: l10n
Dear Maintainer,
we try to install from the desktop icon of debian-live-7.2-i386-lxde-
desktop.iso using italian language and we had this installation failure (we
already had the same installation failure from debian
Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:52:55 +0200
with message-id <201308311253.30231.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #695669,
regarding Installation Failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:01:13 +0200
with message-id <201307201401.32133.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #650239,
regarding Installation Failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 00:54:38 +0200
with message-id <201307200054.58292.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #541987,
regarding Installation failure Squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: installation-reports
Wheezy DI-b4 lxde Binary-1 20121117-19:19
debian-wheezy-DI-b4-i386-lxde-CD-1.iso
Booted from CD; Dec. 10, 2012 c.10AM
Machine: HPcompaq 6910p
Processor: Intel Core(TM)2 Duo
Memory: 2G
Disk /dev/sda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1459
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:39:25 +0200
with message-id <87k3su530i@c1.jkn.iki.fi>
and subject line Re: Bug#691922: Acknowledgement (installation failure with 2TB
disk)
has caused the Debian Bug report #691922,
regarding installation failure with 2TB disk
to be marked a
On Thu 01 Nov 2012 at 20:02:38 +0200, Jukka Neppius wrote:
> I figured why it hangs:
>
> Last messages for normal users are:
> "Searching drives for an installer ISO Image"
> "Mounting /dev/sda4..."
>
> /dev/sda4 is an extended partition
>
> I installed Debian in expert mode to avoid that. In
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Sure, now reduced to 99488 bytes. I hope that nobody sells a "1GB
> key" with less that a GB room :)
Thanks!
I figured why it hangs:
Last messages for normal users are:
"Searching drives for an installer ISO Image"
"Mounting /dev/sda4..."
/dev/sda4 is an exten
Hello,
Jukka Neppius, le Wed 31 Oct 2012 13:42:19 +0200, a écrit :
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apas02.html
> #howto-getting-images-usb
> says it is a 256 MB image, so my 1 GB stick (Kingston) should be enough.
This version of the manual used to be outdated. I have now setup a
c
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB stick
Image version: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/
installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz
22:54 10-10-12 34044754
f5ba7c69f0c53e6f245443140c9b7a7b boot.img.gz
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apas02.htm
Things are going downhill rapidly. I decided to skip the On-Disk "DVD" and
do an internet installation, but can't get the small version to download to
a CD. If I transfer it from hard-disc "downloads" the resulting CD won't
do the boot. Now I can't get anything but my last (invalid) installation
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: "DVD" from On-Disk ("GNU/Linux 6.0 "Squeeze" - 32 bit")
Image version: ditto
Date: 27 Nov, afternoon
Machine: Toshiba laptop
2415-5205 (very reliable)
Processor:Pent4-M
Memory:1GB
Partitions: one
only -- no other systems present. replaced Ubuntu, which
Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:06:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#646829: fixed in udev 175-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #646829,
regarding installation failure - CD not mounted properly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:02:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#646829: fixed in debian-installer-utils 1.86
has caused the Debian Bug report #646829,
regarding installation failure - CD not mounted properly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 646829 -1
Bug#646829: installation failure - CD not mounted properly
Bug 646829 cloned as bug 646835.
> reassign 646829 debian-installer-utils
Bug #646829 [apt-setup] installation failure - CD not mounted properly
Bug reassigne
clone 646829 -1
reassign 646829 debian-installer-utils
reassign -1 udev-udeb
thanks
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 04:56:05PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Package: apt-setup
> Version: 1:0.55
> Severity: serious
> Tags: d-i
>
> Hi,
>
> I've seen lots of recent reports of problems trying to install fr
Package: apt-setup
Version: 1:0.55
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Hi,
I've seen lots of recent reports of problems trying to install from
CD/DVD, and I've tried a test install to see what's going on.
When installing without network, grub-installer can't install the
grub-pc package that it needs. Th
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:45:34 +
with message-id <201102261745.34248.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #256267,
regarding Installation failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #452063
has caused the Debian Bug report #452063,
regarding Debian installation failure on Dell SC440
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #446704
has caused the Debian Bug report #446704,
regarding installation failure on Intel DQ35JO
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #385785
has caused the Debian Bug report #385785,
regarding installation failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #385782
has caused the Debian Bug report #385782,
regarding Etch testing: Grub installation failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #379513
has caused the Debian Bug report #379513,
regarding Installation Failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #362448
has caused the Debian Bug report #362448,
regarding Installation failure report - testing build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #362447
has caused the Debian Bug report #362447,
regarding Installation failure report - latest build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #253312
has caused the Debian Bug report #253312,
regarding Installation failure for XFS over LVM on Test1 Sarge Netinstall CD
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #298907
has caused the Debian Bug report #298907,
regarding Installation Failure on 1st generation Imac
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #282694
has caused the Debian Bug report #282694,
regarding Installation Failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #266992
has caused the Debian Bug report #266992,
regarding Installation Failure - IBM PS/2 35SX
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:17:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#572724: fixed in debian-installer 20100719
has caused the Debian Bug report #572724,
regarding Squeeze installation failure on Itanium w/QLogic fibre channel adapter
to be marked as done.
This means that you
tag 572724 pending
thanks
On Friday 05 March 2010, Jim Uhl wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
>
> This machine has two QLogic fibre channel cards adapters requiring
> 'ql2300_fw.bin', which the installer asks for. Inserting a
> vfat-formatted USB pen drive with the Debian firmware package
> 'firmware-ql
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 572724 pending
Bug #572724 [installation-reports] Squeeze installation failure on Itanium
w/QLogic fibre channel adapter
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/ia64/iso-cd/debian-testing-ia64-netinst.iso
17-Feb-2010 23:23
Date: 05-Mar-2010 13:30 PST
Machine: HP Integrity rx2600
Processor: Itanium2
Memory: 10GB
Partitions: *Fibre ch
Your message dated Thu, 3 Dec 2009 00:03:09 -0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation
failure
has caused the Debian Bug report #557605,
regarding installation-reports: grub2 installation failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> To look at this issue we'll need that you run a installation using
> daily and get the syslog. The installer has a menu option to you to
> get the logs.
Otavio, there is no bug here.
The stable version of the installer is very simply incompati
Hello,
To look at this issue we'll need that you run a installation using
daily and get the syslog. The installer has a menu option to you to
get the logs.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854
reopen 557605
thanks
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Braslau & Rachline wrote:
> On Friday, I had the opportunity to reinstall Debian (sid)
> on another machine. I thus used the daily image of the debian installer
> and it failed in exactly the same manner as described in the present
> bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 557605
Bug #557605 {Done: Frans Pop } [installation-reports]
installation-reports: grub2 installation failure
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
On Monday 23 November 2009 10:41:51 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Braslau & Rachline
wrote:
>
> > I used the "stable" 5.0.3 version of the debian installer
> > to install the "unstable" distribution. This probably explains
> > the differences.
>
> Yes, it explains
Hello Alan,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> 2. *grub2 install failed* during the install process.
> (Seems to be an incompatibility between debian-installer
> and a changed syntax in the grub package. I do not remember the exact
> text, but vt4 showed a command-line option
On Monday 23 November 2009 12:27:04 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the installation-reports package:
>
> #557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure
>
> It has been c
Your message dated Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:24:55 +0100
with message-id <200911231224.56224.elen...@planet.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation
failure
has caused the Debian Bug report #557605,
regarding installation-reports: grub2 installation failure
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/5.0.3/i386/iso-cd/debian-503-i386-businesscard.iso
6 September 2009
Date: November 22, 2009 19:00 UTC
Machine: Dell (pentium III)
Partitions:
Files
I've run into this bug with a recent install (Jul 30):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541823
Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-re
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:37:53PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 02 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> > It's d-i trunk revision 51621 with this sources.list.local:
>
> This is your problem:
> Mar 2 18:48:08 main-menu[1192]: INFO: Menu item 'live-installer' selected
[..snip..]
> Make sure
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> It's d-i trunk revision 51621 with this sources.list.local:
This is your problem:
Mar 2 18:48:08 main-menu[1192]: INFO: Menu item 'live-installer' selected
Because of the custom udebs you are including, the build is automatically
pulling in addit
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 06:03:52PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 02 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> > while testing the multipath inststallation the current lenny installer +
>
> *Exactly* which installer image did you use?
It's d-i trunk revision 51621 with this sources.list.local:
deb
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> while testing the multipath inststallation the current lenny installer +
*Exactly* which installer image did you use?
> the multipath patches posted to the bts fails like this during the
> "install system" step (it prints "running preseed..." in the
Hi,
while testing the multipath inststallation the current lenny installer +
the multipath patches posted to the bts fails like this during the
"install system" step (it prints "running preseed..." in the progress
bar dialog at this moment:
Mar 2 13:12:12 apt-install: Queueing package e2fsprogs f
Hi
> Nov 22 09:07:44 anna[4499]: WARNING **: no packages for kernel in
> archive
I had this issue also but I think it was during the weekend. When I took
the next build it worked. The error was due to a mismatch in the
versions. Check the kernel version on the installer and on the modules
in the
I get the same problem with the business card iso. Here is part of the
syslog:
Nov 22 09:06:50 localechooser: info: Set debian-installer/locale =
'en_US.UTF-8'
Nov 22 09:07:13 main-menu[1383]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6): package
doesn't exist (ignored)
Nov 22 09:07:15 main-menu[1383]: INFO: Menu ite
Just after the installer identified an ISO image, I get this error:
--
Load installer components from an installer ISO
No kernem modules were found. This probably is due to a mismatch
between the kernel used by this version of the instal
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-businesscard.iso
Date: Nov. 19 2007, 20h CET
Machine: Dell SC440
Processor: Intel Pentium E2160
Memory: 1GB
Partitions: 145 GB ext3 in s
to get around the nic problem i just put in an old spare nic i had
here. then i just installed via usb key to get around the cdrom
issue.
the cdrom is now recognized, the onboard nic isn't though.
thx
matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
to get around the nic problem i just put in an old spare nic i had
here. then i just installed via usb key to get around the cdrom
issue.
the cdrom is now recognized, the onboard nic isn't though.
thx
matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: cd
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-CD-1.iso
Date: 12 Oct 2007
Machine: Intel VPro Desktop Board DQ35JO
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6420 @ 2.13GHz
Memory: 2G
Partitions: /dev/
Using todays netinstall daily build ISO image (11/05/2007), the installation
went fine. No more errors. Installation completed sucessfully. Thank you for
the quick fix!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 10 May 2007 23:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have tried installing via netinstall CD (daily build - few days old,
> although it was the latest build as of yesterday), but if
> I select LVM2 with Encryption (LUKS), I receive the following error on
> the Partition section:
>
> In vt2,
Hello,
I have tried installing via netinstall CD (daily build - few days old,
although it was the latest build as of yesterday), but if
I select LVM2 with Encryption (LUKS), I receive the following error on the
Partition section:
Partition disks
Configuration of encrypted volumes failed
An err
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 387767 linux-2.6
Bug#387767: Installation Failure
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 387767 kernel panic when accessing CD-ROM
Bug#387767: Installation Failure
Changed Bug title.
&
reassign 387767 linux-2.6
retitle 387767 kernel panic when accessing CD-ROM
thanks
On Friday 22 September 2006 07:50, Keith Parkansky wrote:
> My apologies for the delay in sending this additional info. What
> follows is what appears on the screen when I get the kernel panic. The
> first 20 line
My apologies for the delay in sending
this additional info. What follows is
what appears on the screen when I get
the kernel panic. The first 20 lines
have 8-digit hex numbers in front of
them starting with a 'b'. I have
omitted those numbers.
cdrom_start_packet_command+0xf2/0x129 [ide_cd]
cdr
Let me preface my information below by
saying that while I was trying different
things, I found that if I don't set the
framebuffer to false, I never see the
kernel panic. The system locks up tight
with a gray bar (row) at the bottom of a
blue screen. If I do set the frame buffer
to false, I can
On Saturday 16 September 2006 18:06, Keith Parkansky wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Encountered same kernel panic ("not syncing") during
> installation using both i386 CD#1 and NETINST CD on
> two separate (but same hardware) systems.
Is the system frozen after the error or can you still for exampl
I forgot to mention the slight
detail that I'm having install
kernel panics with Etch Beta 3.
Also, I tried doing the install
by disabling DHCP and setting
framebuffer to false but still
got the kernel panic.
--
Keith Parkansky
"If being in a plane is flying, then
riding in a boat is swimming." S
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Tried both i386 CD#1 and NETINST CD
Image version: 9/13/06 (CD#1) and 9/14/06 (NETINST CD) from cdimage.debian.org
Date: 9/13/06 (CD#1) and 9/14/06 (NETINST)
Machine: Clone with Intel AL440LX motherboard
Processor: Intel PII 233
Memory: 192 Meg
Partitio
On Sunday 03 September 2006 04:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Burned .iso with Nero 6 in Win2000; Nero reported CD was ok after
> verification stage.
> I used boot parameter to force static IP.
> NIC was not detected (SMC 1211TX = RTL8139).
That is expected as the NIC can only
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:37:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 08:39:36 +0200, "Christian Perrier"
>
> > Can you run "(lspci ; lspci -n)|sort" on that machine
> > Then send us the output relevant to your NIC and
> > the interface your CD is attached on.
>
> [ "I don't und
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 08:39:36 +0200, "Christian Perrier"
> What interface does your CD drive use?
The IDE controller on the motherboard.
/dev/hda: Pioneer DVD-120 (boot device)
/dev/hdb: Sony CRX-230ED
/dev/hdc: Nothing
/dev/hdd: Nothing
> Can you run "(lspci ; lspci -n)|sort" on that machine (may
reassign 385782 grub-installer
retitle 385782 Installs on wrong drive in some situations
thanks
> After recovering from the shock (my windows installation required for
> work didn't start as well, I started investigating what happened.
> My system was configured to boot from SCSI first, but GRUB
> Comments/Problems:
> Burned .iso with Nero 6 in Win2000; Nero reported CD was ok after
> verification stage.
> I used boot parameter to force static IP.
> NIC was not detected (SMC 1211TX = RTL8139).
> Installer reported CD files could not be loaded.
> Installation attempt aborted.
What interf
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD, from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Image version: 2006/09/02, 1800UTC
Date: 2006/09/02, 1900UTC
Machine: Supermicro P6DGE motherboard
Processor: Dual P3 600/100/512K/2.05V
Memory: 512MB (2
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: network i386
Image version: debian.de
Date: 1. Aug. 2006
Machine: Dell Precision 650
Processor: dual XEON P4 2 GHZ
Memory: 1536 MB
Partitions:
IDE Disk 0 Extended Partition NTFS
SCSI Controller 0, Disk 0, Partitions: 2 / WinXP Boot, debian root
SCSI C
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 256067 [i386][20040624] aic7xxx and 3C905C-tx problems
Bug#256067: Installation failure
Changed Bug title.
> tags 256067 + moreinfo
Bug#256067: [i386][20040624] aic7xxx and 3C905C-tx problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: mo
retitle 256067 [i386][20040624] aic7xxx and 3C905C-tx problems
tags 256067 + moreinfo
thanks
Hello Michael Satterwhite,
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:11:51PM -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: <06/24/2004 Sid Installation 386 / Current >
> uname -a:
> Date: <6/24/2004 1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 379513 installation-reports
Bug#379513: Installation Failure
Warning: Unknown package 'report'
Bug reassigned from package `installation report' to `installation-reports'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Ple
On Monday 24 July 2006 03:57, Trevor de Stigter wrote:
> When running in expert mode the installer says that the i82365 (for the
> Cirrus logic chip which i think is used on the particular machine as
> the io controller for the pcmcia port) is needed
OK, so the module is needed.
What is the outpu
Hi,
Further to my previous-
After the error is reported pressing any key causes the installation to
continue "starting card serveces", and then displays a further screen
saying "no ethernet card detected" The D-Link PCMCIA card is not
amongst the available options"
When I select "Go back" on
On Monday 24 July 2006 01:32, Trevor de Stigter wrote:
> Then Detecting Network hardware reported error while running modprobe
> -v i82365.
What was the exact error? You should be able to see that in output of
'dmesg' or 'nano /var/log/syslog' from VT2.
What kernel version was the installer ru
Package: installation report
Boot Method: Floppies (Machine no longer has CD)
Image version: March 2005 image files downloaded from www.debian.org
July 2006.
Date: 24 July 06 10:30 NZST
Machine: Acer Acernote Nuovo Notebook
Processor: Pentium 166M
Memory: 48Mb
Partitions: Did not get to th
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo