Bug#993417: Installation failure on i386 system / Debian 11

2021-09-05 Thread Craig Norborg
That appears to have done it, about halfway through installing right now. Will let you know if that changes. On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 7:21 AM Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hi again Craig! > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 06:51:40PM -0600, Craig Norborg wrote: > >I used software called "Rufus". screen cap

Bug#993417: Installation failure on i386 system / Debian 11

2021-09-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi again Craig! On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 06:51:40PM -0600, Craig Norborg wrote: >I used software called "Rufus".   screen cap below of the options.  Same exact >drive when I did it with Ubuntu. Hmmm, that surprises me - Rufus normally works very well with our images. Out of curiosity, could you pl

Bug#993417: Installation failure on i386 system / Debian 11

2021-08-31 Thread Craig Norborg
I used software called "Rufus". screen cap below of the options. Same exact drive when I did it with Ubuntu. [image: image.png] On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:29 PM Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi Craig, > > Craig Norborg (2021-08-31): > > Comments/Problems: I played around and could see the error >

Bug#993417: Installation failure on i386 system / Debian 11

2021-08-31 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi Craig, On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 06:05:25PM -0600, Craig Norborg wrote: > >Package: installation-reports > >Boot method: USB stick >Image version: >https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/i386/iso-dvd/debian-11.0.0-i386-DVD-1.iso >Date: 8/31/21 5:50PM MST >Machine: Dell Dimension 8400 >Proc

Bug#993417: Installation failure on i386 system / Debian 11

2021-08-31 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Craig, Craig Norborg (2021-08-31): > Comments/Problems: I played around and could see the error > "/install.i386/vmlinuz not found". Saw this in multiple places. > >and ideas you had during the initial install.> I was trying to > bring up a friends old machine with a decent OS, so I

Bug#967963: marked as done (installation failure: rockpro64)

2020-08-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 9 Aug 2020 14:33:51 +0200 with message-id <20200809143351.2a49bd0065010c3624d0d...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#967963: installation failure: rockpro64 has caused the Debian Bug report #967963, regarding installation failure: rockpro64 to be marked as done.

Re: Bug#967963: installation failure: rockpro64

2020-08-09 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Forest wrote: > On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:27:14 +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote: > >It's updated now, so the current daily builds should work. > > Thank you! > > >Can you check /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/chosen/stdout-path > > It contains "serial2:150n8" which I suppose is the expected v

Bug#967963: installation failure: rockpro64

2020-08-07 Thread Forest
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:27:14 +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote: >It's updated now, so the current daily builds should work. Thank you! >Can you check /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/chosen/stdout-path It contains "serial2:150n8" which I suppose is the expected value (though maybe not the best choi

Bug#844519: marked as done (Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure)

2020-08-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 7 Aug 2020 23:44:04 +0200 with message-id <20200807234404.35e377ed8bc47c218bcf5...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 4 has caused the Debian Bug report #844519, regarding Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure to be

Bug#967963: installation failure: rockpro64

2020-08-06 Thread Alper Nebi Yasak
On 06/08/2020 03:04, Forest wrote: I used the installer image from over a week ago, because d-i.debian.org has no newer daily images. That happens frequently, as when the kernel is updated in the archive the installer sources have to be manually updated to build for/with the new kernel. The o

Bug#967963: installation failure: rockpro64

2020-08-05 Thread Forest
Package: installation-reports Boot method: SD card Image version: https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/arm64/20200727-02:25/netboot/SD-card-images/firmware.rockpro64-rk3399.img.gz Date: 2020-08-05 Machine: RockPro64 Processor: Rockchip rk3399 Memory: 4GB Partitions: /dev/mmcblk1p1 Output of lspc

Bug#923649: debian-installer: GRUB installation failure with U-Boot

2019-03-03 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Package: debian-installer Version: 20190302-5 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I used https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20190302-5/arm64/iso-cd/debian-testing-arm64-netinst.iso to install Debian Buster on a Pine A64 LTS board. U-Boot currently does not support EFI variable a

Re: how to get/put up installation report on installation failure when immediate network is not available.

2017-04-27 Thread shirish शिरीष
In-line :- On 26/04/2017, shirish शिरीष wrote: > in-line :- > > On 25/04/2017, Baptiste Jammet wrote: >> Hello, >> > > Hello, > >> Dixit shirish शिरीष, le 25/04/2017 : >> >>>My query is how to save installation report and send it in the >>>instance when the installation is a failure. I know that

Re: how to get/put up installation report on installation failure when immediate network is not available.

2017-04-25 Thread shirish शिरीष
in-line :- On 25/04/2017, Baptiste Jammet wrote: > Hello, > Hello, > Dixit shirish शिरीष, le 25/04/2017 : > >>My query is how to save installation report and send it in the >>instance when the installation is a failure. I know that details of >>what worked or didn't is in the memory (RAM) but h

Re: how to get/put up installation report on installation failure when immediate network is not available.

2017-04-25 Thread Baptiste Jammet
Hello, Dixit shirish शिरीष, le 25/04/2017 : >My query is how to save installation report and send it in the >instance when the installation is a failure. I know that details of >what worked or didn't is in the memory (RAM) but how to save it to usb >disk/usb thumbdrive ? At times where I'm insta

how to get/put up installation report on installation failure when immediate network is not available.

2017-04-24 Thread shirish शिरीष
Dear all, There are two three queries I have but instead of bunching them together, would try to get solutions or pointers by spelling them individually. Below is the first one - 1. Installation report on installation failure - At times when you are installing Debian either on too new hardware

Bug#844519: Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure

2016-11-16 Thread Michael Owen
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:20:47 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Owen (2016-11-16): > > Package: installation-reports > > > > Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure > > > > Boot method: netinst, both Alpha 8 and Daily Build > > Im

Bug#844519: Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure

2016-11-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Michael, Michael Owen (2016-11-16): > Package: installation-reports > > Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure > > Boot method: netinst, both Alpha 8 and Daily Build > Image version: Alpha 8 > Date: Multiple times, multiple machines, multiple drives > > Mac

Bug#844519: Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure

2016-11-16 Thread Michael Owen
Package: installation-reports Stretch Alpha 8 Installation Failure Boot method: netinst, both Alpha 8 and Daily Build Image version: Alpha 8 Date: Multiple times, multiple machines, multiple drives Machine: Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2K Dell Inspiron 3847 Processor: Intel Core2 Duo 7800

Bug#728711: marked as done (debian-installer-launcher: installation failure using italian language)

2015-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 08 May 2015 13:02:31 +0200 with message-id <1831348.ooWXSrhHnd@hipnos> and subject line debian-installer-launcher: installation failure using italian language has caused the Debian Bug report #728711, regarding debian-installer-launcher: installation failure using i

Bug#728711: debian-installer-launcher: installation failure using italian language

2013-11-04 Thread MAG4 Piemonte
Package: debian-installer-launcher Version: 17 Severity: important Tags: l10n Dear Maintainer, we try to install from the desktop icon of debian-live-7.2-i386-lxde- desktop.iso using italian language and we had this installation failure (we already had the same installation failure from debian

Bug#695669: marked as done (Installation Failure)

2013-08-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:52:55 +0200 with message-id <201308311253.30231.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #695669, regarding Installation Failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#650239: marked as done (Installation Failure)

2013-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:01:13 +0200 with message-id <201307201401.32133.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #650239, regarding Installation Failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#541987: marked as done (Installation failure Squeeze)

2013-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 00:54:38 +0200 with message-id <201307200054.58292.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #541987, regarding Installation failure Squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#695669: Installation Failure

2012-12-11 Thread Norman Walker
Package: installation-reports Wheezy DI-b4 lxde Binary-1 20121117-19:19 debian-wheezy-DI-b4-i386-lxde-CD-1.iso Booted from CD; Dec. 10, 2012 c.10AM Machine: HPcompaq 6910p Processor: Intel Core(TM)2 Duo Memory: 2G Disk /dev/sda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1459

Bug#691922: marked as done (installation failure with 2TB disk)

2012-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:39:25 +0200 with message-id <87k3su530i@c1.jkn.iki.fi> and subject line Re: Bug#691922: Acknowledgement (installation failure with 2TB disk) has caused the Debian Bug report #691922, regarding installation failure with 2TB disk to be marked a

Re: Bug#691922: installation failure with 2TB disk

2012-11-02 Thread Brian Potkin
On Thu 01 Nov 2012 at 20:02:38 +0200, Jukka Neppius wrote: > I figured why it hangs: > > Last messages for normal users are: > "Searching drives for an installer ISO Image" > "Mounting /dev/sda4..." > > /dev/sda4 is an extended partition > > I installed Debian in expert mode to avoid that. In

Bug#691922: installation failure with 2TB disk

2012-11-01 Thread Jukka Neppius
Samuel Thibault writes: > Sure, now reduced to 99488 bytes. I hope that nobody sells a "1GB > key" with less that a GB room :) Thanks! I figured why it hangs: Last messages for normal users are: "Searching drives for an installer ISO Image" "Mounting /dev/sda4..." /dev/sda4 is an exten

Bug#691922: installation failure with 2TB disk

2012-11-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Jukka Neppius, le Wed 31 Oct 2012 13:42:19 +0200, a écrit : > http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apas02.html > #howto-getting-images-usb > says it is a 256 MB image, so my 1 GB stick (Kingston) should be enough. This version of the manual used to be outdated. I have now setup a c

Bug#691922: installation failure with 2TB disk

2012-10-31 Thread Jukka Neppius
Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB stick Image version: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/ installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz 22:54 10-10-12 34044754 f5ba7c69f0c53e6f245443140c9b7a7b boot.img.gz http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apas02.htm

Bug#650239: Installation Failure

2011-11-28 Thread Pa Blum
Things are going downhill rapidly. I decided to skip the On-Disk "DVD" and do an internet installation, but can't get the small version to download to a CD. If I transfer it from hard-disc "downloads" the resulting CD won't do the boot. Now I can't get anything but my last (invalid) installation

Bug#650239: Installation Failure

2011-11-27 Thread Pa Blum
Package: installation-reports Boot method: "DVD" from On-Disk ("GNU/Linux 6.0 "Squeeze" - 32 bit") Image version: ditto Date: 27 Nov, afternoon Machine: Toshiba laptop 2415-5205 (very reliable) Processor:Pent4-M Memory:1GB Partitions: one only -- no other systems present. replaced Ubuntu, which

Bug#646829: marked as done (installation failure - CD not mounted properly)

2011-11-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:06:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#646829: fixed in udev 175-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #646829, regarding installation failure - CD not mounted properly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#646829: marked as done (installation failure - CD not mounted properly)

2011-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:02:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#646829: fixed in debian-installer-utils 1.86 has caused the Debian Bug report #646829, regarding installation failure - CD not mounted properly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Re: Bug#646829: installation failure - CD not mounted properly

2011-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 646829 -1 Bug#646829: installation failure - CD not mounted properly Bug 646829 cloned as bug 646835. > reassign 646829 debian-installer-utils Bug #646829 [apt-setup] installation failure - CD not mounted properly Bug reassigne

Bug#646829: installation failure - CD not mounted properly

2011-10-27 Thread Colin Watson
clone 646829 -1 reassign 646829 debian-installer-utils reassign -1 udev-udeb thanks On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 04:56:05PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Package: apt-setup > Version: 1:0.55 > Severity: serious > Tags: d-i > > Hi, > > I've seen lots of recent reports of problems trying to install fr

Bug#646829: installation failure - CD not mounted properly

2011-10-27 Thread Steve McIntyre
Package: apt-setup Version: 1:0.55 Severity: serious Tags: d-i Hi, I've seen lots of recent reports of problems trying to install from CD/DVD, and I've tried a test install to see what's going on. When installing without network, grub-installer can't install the grub-pc package that it needs. Th

Bug#256267: marked as done (Installation failure)

2011-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:45:34 + with message-id <201102261745.34248.el...@debianpt.org> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #256267, regarding Installation failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#452063: marked as done (Debian installation failure on Dell SC440)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:28 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #452063 has caused the Debian Bug report #452063, regarding Debian installation failure on Dell SC440 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#446704: marked as done (installation failure on Intel DQ35JO)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:27 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #446704 has caused the Debian Bug report #446704, regarding installation failure on Intel DQ35JO to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#385785: marked as done (installation failure)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:18 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #385785 has caused the Debian Bug report #385785, regarding installation failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#385782: marked as done (Etch testing: Grub installation failure)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:18 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #385782 has caused the Debian Bug report #385782, regarding Etch testing: Grub installation failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#379513: marked as done (Installation Failure)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:15 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #379513 has caused the Debian Bug report #379513, regarding Installation Failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#362448: marked as done (Installation failure report - testing build)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:12 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #362448 has caused the Debian Bug report #362448, regarding Installation failure report - testing build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#362447: marked as done (Installation failure report - latest build)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:12 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #362447 has caused the Debian Bug report #362447, regarding Installation failure report - latest build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#253312: marked as done (Installation failure for XFS over LVM on Test1 Sarge Netinstall CD)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:39 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #253312 has caused the Debian Bug report #253312, regarding Installation failure for XFS over LVM on Test1 Sarge Netinstall CD to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#298907: marked as done (Installation Failure on 1st generation Imac)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:54 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #298907 has caused the Debian Bug report #298907, regarding Installation Failure on 1st generation Imac to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#282694: marked as done (Installation Failure)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:47 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #282694 has caused the Debian Bug report #282694, regarding Installation Failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#266992: marked as done (Installation Failure - IBM PS/2 35SX)

2010-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:35 + with message-id and subject line Closing old installation report #266992 has caused the Debian Bug report #266992, regarding Installation Failure - IBM PS/2 35SX to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#572724: marked as done (Squeeze installation failure on Itanium w/QLogic fibre channel adapter)

2010-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:17:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#572724: fixed in debian-installer 20100719 has caused the Debian Bug report #572724, regarding Squeeze installation failure on Itanium w/QLogic fibre channel adapter to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#572724: Squeeze installation failure on Itanium w/QLogic fibre channel adapter

2010-03-05 Thread Frans Pop
tag 572724 pending thanks On Friday 05 March 2010, Jim Uhl wrote: > Comments/Problems: > > This machine has two QLogic fibre channel cards adapters requiring > 'ql2300_fw.bin', which the installer asks for. Inserting a > vfat-formatted USB pen drive with the Debian firmware package > 'firmware-ql

Processed: Re: Bug#572724: Squeeze installation failure on Itanium w/QLogic fibre channel adapter

2010-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 572724 pending Bug #572724 [installation-reports] Squeeze installation failure on Itanium w/QLogic fibre channel adapter Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tr

Bug#572724: Squeeze installation failure on Itanium w/QLogic fibre channel adapter

2010-03-05 Thread Jim Uhl
Package: installation-reports Boot method: netinst CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/ia64/iso-cd/debian-testing-ia64-netinst.iso 17-Feb-2010 23:23 Date: 05-Mar-2010 13:30 PST Machine: HP Integrity rx2600 Processor: Itanium2 Memory: 10GB Partitions: *Fibre ch

Bug#557605: marked as done (installation-reports: grub2 installation failure)

2009-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 3 Dec 2009 00:03:09 -0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure has caused the Debian Bug report #557605, regarding installation-reports: grub2 installation failure to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure

2009-12-01 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: > To look at this issue we'll need that you run a installation using > daily and get the syslog. The installer has a menu option to you to > get the logs. Otavio, there is no bug here. The stable version of the installer is very simply incompati

Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure

2009-12-01 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, To look at this issue we'll need that you run a installation using daily and get the syslog. The installer has a menu option to you to get the logs. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854

Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure

2009-12-01 Thread Otavio Salvador
reopen 557605 thanks Hello, On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Braslau & Rachline wrote: > On Friday, I had the opportunity to reinstall Debian (sid) > on another machine. I thus used the daily image of the debian installer > and it failed in exactly the same manner as described in the present > bu

Processed: Re: Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure

2009-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 557605 Bug #557605 {Done: Frans Pop } [installation-reports] installation-reports: grub2 installation failure > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure

2009-11-30 Thread Braslau & Rachline
On Monday 23 November 2009 10:41:51 Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Braslau & Rachline wrote: > > > I used the "stable" 5.0.3 version of the debian installer > > to install the "unstable" distribution. This probably explains > > the differences. > > Yes, it explains

Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure

2009-11-23 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Alan, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > 2. *grub2 install failed* during the install process. > (Seems to be an incompatibility between debian-installer > and a changed syntax in the grub package. I do not remember the exact > text, but vt4 showed a command-line option

Bug#557605: closed by Frans Pop (reply to 557...@bugs.debian.org) (Re: Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure)

2009-11-23 Thread Braslau & Rachline
On Monday 23 November 2009 12:27:04 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the installation-reports package: > > #557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure > > It has been c

Bug#557605: marked as done (installation-reports: grub2 installation failure)

2009-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:24:55 +0100 with message-id <200911231224.56224.elen...@planet.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure has caused the Debian Bug report #557605, regarding installation-reports: grub2 installation failure

Bug#557605: installation-reports: grub2 installation failure

2009-11-23 Thread Alan BRASLAU
Package: installation-reports Severity: important -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/5.0.3/i386/iso-cd/debian-503-i386-businesscard.iso 6 September 2009 Date: November 22, 2009 19:00 UTC Machine: Dell (pentium III) Partitions: Files

Bug#492790: installation failure with LUKS over LVM

2009-08-16 Thread Celejar
I've run into this bug with a recent install (Jul 30): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541823 Celejar -- mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-re

Re: installation failure with current lenny packages

2008-03-07 Thread Guido Günther
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:37:53PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 02 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote: > > It's d-i trunk revision 51621 with this sources.list.local: > > This is your problem: > Mar 2 18:48:08 main-menu[1192]: INFO: Menu item 'live-installer' selected [..snip..] > Make sure

Re: installation failure with current lenny packages

2008-03-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote: > It's d-i trunk revision 51621 with this sources.list.local: This is your problem: Mar 2 18:48:08 main-menu[1192]: INFO: Menu item 'live-installer' selected Because of the custom udebs you are including, the build is automatically pulling in addit

Re: installation failure with current lenny packages

2008-03-02 Thread Guido Günther
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 06:03:52PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 02 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote: > > while testing the multipath inststallation the current lenny installer + > > *Exactly* which installer image did you use? It's d-i trunk revision 51621 with this sources.list.local: deb

Re: installation failure with current lenny packages

2008-03-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote: > while testing the multipath inststallation the current lenny installer + *Exactly* which installer image did you use? > the multipath patches posted to the bts fails like this during the > "install system" step (it prints "running preseed..." in the

installation failure with current lenny packages

2008-03-02 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, while testing the multipath inststallation the current lenny installer + the multipath patches posted to the bts fails like this during the "install system" step (it prints "running preseed..." in the progress bar dialog at this moment: Mar 2 13:12:12 apt-install: Queueing package e2fsprogs f

Re: installation failure: No kernel modules were found

2007-11-22 Thread Peter Skogström
Hi > Nov 22 09:07:44 anna[4499]: WARNING **: no packages for kernel in > archive I had this issue also but I think it was during the weekend. When I took the next build it worked. The error was due to a mismatch in the versions. Check the kernel version on the installer and on the modules in the

Re: installation failure: No kernel modules were found

2007-11-22 Thread Ross Boylan
I get the same problem with the business card iso. Here is part of the syslog: Nov 22 09:06:50 localechooser: info: Set debian-installer/locale = 'en_US.UTF-8' Nov 22 09:07:13 main-menu[1383]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6): package doesn't exist (ignored) Nov 22 09:07:15 main-menu[1383]: INFO: Menu ite

installation failure: No kernel modules were found

2007-11-22 Thread Ross Boylan
Just after the installer identified an ISO image, I get this error: -- Load installer components from an installer ISO No kernem modules were found. This probably is due to a mismatch between the kernel used by this version of the instal

Bug#452063: Debian installation failure on Dell SC440

2007-11-20 Thread Erwan David
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-businesscard.iso Date: Nov. 19 2007, 20h CET Machine: Dell SC440 Processor: Intel Pentium E2160 Memory: 1GB Partitions: 145 GB ext3 in s

Bug#446704: Acknowledgement (installation failure on Intel DQ35JO)

2007-10-14 Thread m . c . wilkins
to get around the nic problem i just put in an old spare nic i had here. then i just installed via usb key to get around the cdrom issue. the cdrom is now recognized, the onboard nic isn't though. thx matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Bug#446704: Acknowledgement (installation failure on Intel DQ35JO)

2007-10-14 Thread m . c . wilkins
to get around the nic problem i just put in an old spare nic i had here. then i just installed via usb key to get around the cdrom issue. the cdrom is now recognized, the onboard nic isn't though. thx matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Bug#446704: installation failure on Intel DQ35JO

2007-10-14 Thread m . c . wilkins
Package: installation-reports Boot method: cd Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-CD-1.iso Date: 12 Oct 2007 Machine: Intel VPro Desktop Board DQ35JO Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6420 @ 2.13GHz Memory: 2G Partitions: /dev/

Re: LVM2 + LUKS Installation Failure (netinstall) due to device-mapper

2007-05-11 Thread b7fdx4q02
Using todays netinstall daily build ISO image (11/05/2007), the installation went fine. No more errors. Installation completed sucessfully. Thank you for the quick fix! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: LVM2 + LUKS Installation Failure (netinstall) due to device-mapper

2007-05-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 10 May 2007 23:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have tried installing via netinstall CD (daily build - few days old, > although it was the latest build as of yesterday), but if > I select LVM2 with Encryption (LUKS), I receive the following error on > the Partition section: > > In vt2,

LVM2 + LUKS Installation Failure (netinstall) due to device-mapper

2007-05-10 Thread b7fdx4q02
Hello, I have tried installing via netinstall CD (daily build - few days old, although it was the latest build as of yesterday), but if I select LVM2 with Encryption (LUKS), I receive the following error on the Partition section: Partition disks Configuration of encrypted volumes failed An err

Processed: Re: Bug#387767: Installation Failure

2006-10-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 387767 linux-2.6 Bug#387767: Installation Failure Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'. > retitle 387767 kernel panic when accessing CD-ROM Bug#387767: Installation Failure Changed Bug title. &

Bug#387767: Installation Failure

2006-10-22 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 387767 linux-2.6 retitle 387767 kernel panic when accessing CD-ROM thanks On Friday 22 September 2006 07:50, Keith Parkansky wrote: > My apologies for the delay in sending this additional info. What > follows is what appears on the screen when I get the kernel panic. The > first 20 line

Bug#387767: Installation Failure

2006-09-21 Thread Keith Parkansky
My apologies for the delay in sending this additional info. What follows is what appears on the screen when I get the kernel panic. The first 20 lines have 8-digit hex numbers in front of them starting with a 'b'. I have omitted those numbers. cdrom_start_packet_command+0xf2/0x129 [ide_cd] cdr

Bug#387767: Installation Failure

2006-09-17 Thread Keith Parkansky
Let me preface my information below by saying that while I was trying different things, I found that if I don't set the framebuffer to false, I never see the kernel panic. The system locks up tight with a gray bar (row) at the bottom of a blue screen. If I do set the frame buffer to false, I can

Bug#387767: Installation Failure

2006-09-17 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 16 September 2006 18:06, Keith Parkansky wrote: > Comments/Problems: > Encountered same kernel panic ("not syncing") during > installation using both i386 CD#1 and NETINST CD on > two separate (but same hardware) systems. Is the system frozen after the error or can you still for exampl

Bug#387767: Further Info - Installation Failure

2006-09-16 Thread Keith Parkansky
I forgot to mention the slight detail that I'm having install kernel panics with Etch Beta 3. Also, I tried doing the install by disabling DHCP and setting framebuffer to false but still got the kernel panic. -- Keith Parkansky "If being in a plane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming." S

Bug#387767: Installation Failure

2006-09-16 Thread Keith Parkansky
Package: installation-reports Boot method: Tried both i386 CD#1 and NETINST CD Image version: 9/13/06 (CD#1) and 9/14/06 (NETINST CD) from cdimage.debian.org Date: 9/13/06 (CD#1) and 9/14/06 (NETINST) Machine: Clone with Intel AL440LX motherboard Processor: Intel PII 233 Memory: 192 Meg Partitio

Bug#385785: installation failure

2006-09-14 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 03 September 2006 04:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Comments/Problems: > Burned .iso with Nero 6 in Win2000; Nero reported CD was ok after > verification stage. > I used boot parameter to force static IP. > NIC was not detected (SMC 1211TX = RTL8139). That is expected as the NIC can only

Bug#385785: installation failure

2006-09-04 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:37:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 08:39:36 +0200, "Christian Perrier" > > > Can you run "(lspci ; lspci -n)|sort" on that machine > > Then send us the output relevant to your NIC and > > the interface your CD is attached on. > > [ "I don't und

Bug#385785: installation failure

2006-09-03 Thread suicune
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 08:39:36 +0200, "Christian Perrier" > What interface does your CD drive use? The IDE controller on the motherboard. /dev/hda: Pioneer DVD-120 (boot device) /dev/hdb: Sony CRX-230ED /dev/hdc: Nothing /dev/hdd: Nothing > Can you run "(lspci ; lspci -n)|sort" on that machine (may

Bug#385782: Etch testing: Grub installation failure

2006-09-02 Thread Christian Perrier
reassign 385782 grub-installer retitle 385782 Installs on wrong drive in some situations thanks > After recovering from the shock (my windows installation required for > work didn't start as well, I started investigating what happened. > My system was configured to boot from SCSI first, but GRUB

Bug#385785: installation failure

2006-09-02 Thread Christian Perrier
> Comments/Problems: > Burned .iso with Nero 6 in Win2000; Nero reported CD was ok after > verification stage. > I used boot parameter to force static IP. > NIC was not detected (SMC 1211TX = RTL8139). > Installer reported CD files could not be loaded. > Installation attempt aborted. What interf

Bug#385785: installation failure

2006-09-02 Thread suicune
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD, from http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso Image version: 2006/09/02, 1800UTC Date: 2006/09/02, 1900UTC Machine: Supermicro P6DGE motherboard Processor: Dual P3 600/100/512K/2.05V Memory: 512MB (2

Bug#385782: Etch testing: Grub installation failure

2006-09-02 Thread Adrianes den Toom
Package: installation-reports Boot method: network i386 Image version: debian.de Date: 1. Aug. 2006 Machine: Dell Precision 650 Processor: dual XEON P4 2 GHZ Memory: 1536 MB Partitions: IDE Disk 0 Extended Partition NTFS SCSI Controller 0, Disk 0, Partitions: 2 / WinXP Boot, debian root SCSI C

Processed: Re: Installation failure

2006-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 256067 [i386][20040624] aic7xxx and 3C905C-tx problems Bug#256067: Installation failure Changed Bug title. > tags 256067 + moreinfo Bug#256067: [i386][20040624] aic7xxx and 3C905C-tx problems There were no tags set. Tags added: mo

Bug#256067: Installation failure

2006-08-28 Thread Max Vozeler
retitle 256067 [i386][20040624] aic7xxx and 3C905C-tx problems tags 256067 + moreinfo thanks Hello Michael Satterwhite, On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:11:51PM -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote: > Debian-installer-version: <06/24/2004 Sid Installation 386 / Current > > uname -a: > Date: <6/24/2004 1

Processed: Re: Bug#379513: Installation Failure

2006-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 379513 installation-reports Bug#379513: Installation Failure Warning: Unknown package 'report' Bug reassigned from package `installation report' to `installation-reports'. > -- Stopping processing here. Ple

Bug#379513: Installation Failure

2006-07-23 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 24 July 2006 03:57, Trevor de Stigter wrote: > When running in expert mode the installer says that the i82365 (for the > Cirrus logic chip which i think is used on the particular machine as > the io controller for the pcmcia port) is needed OK, so the module is needed. What is the outpu

Bug#379513: Installation Failure

2006-07-23 Thread Trevor de Stigter
Hi, Further to my previous- After the error is reported pressing any key causes the installation to continue "starting card serveces", and then displays a  further screen saying "no ethernet card detected" The D-Link PCMCIA card is not amongst the available options" When I select "Go back" on

Bug#379513: Installation Failure

2006-07-23 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 24 July 2006 01:32, Trevor de Stigter wrote: > Then Detecting Network hardware reported error while running modprobe > -v i82365. What was the exact error? You should be able to see that in output of 'dmesg' or 'nano /var/log/syslog' from VT2. What kernel version was the installer ru

Bug#379513: Installation Failure

2006-07-23 Thread Trevor de Stigter
Package: installation report Boot Method: Floppies (Machine no longer has CD) Image version: March 2005 image files downloaded from www.debian.org July 2006. Date: 24 July 06 10:30 NZST Machine: Acer Acernote Nuovo Notebook Processor: Pentium 166M Memory: 48Mb Partitions: Did not get to th

  1   2   >