[Denis Barbier]
>> The purpose of languagechooser is to ask the person doing the
>> installation about his preferred language. This information can be
>> used to choose which language to use during installation and set
>> this language as the default language after the installation.
>
> Right, bu
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:33:57PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Denis Barbier]
> > Maybe I missed the purpose of languagechooser? Is it supposed to
> > select installation language, or locales when the system is up? IMO
> > it should be the former, then only languages which provide
> > tr
[Denis Barbier]
> Maybe I missed the purpose of languagechooser? Is it supposed to
> select installation language, or locales when the system is up? IMO
> it should be the former, then only languages which provide
> translated debconf templates for debian-installer should be listed.
The purpose
tis 2003-02-25 klockan 10.26 skrev Denis Barbier:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:51:01PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [...]
> > > Does this mean that LANGUAGE is fully determined by this locale, or
> > > can it be edited?
> >
> > I want it to be fully determined by the locale, and do not see
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:51:01PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[...]
> > Does this mean that LANGUAGE is fully determined by this locale, or
> > can it be edited?
>
> I want it to be fully determined by the locale, and do not see the
> need to edit it manually. Do you think the first time u
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:51:01PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Denis Barbier]
> > I disagree, there is no reason to propose languages which have no
> > translated templates.
>
> Actually, I use this information to also set the default language in
> KDE and GNOME, as well as the default di
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 23:33, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Hi, you did not send your message to debian-boot, do you want to post
> it again, or do you want me to reply there?
>
Sorry. Late night. I meant debian-boot.
> Denis
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:08:23PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
[Denis Barbier]
> I disagree, there is no reason to propose languages which have no
> translated templates.
Actually, I use this information to also set the default language in
KDE and GNOME, as well as the default dictionary in ispell. But there
is no reason to list _all_ languages available, bu
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:01:05PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[...]
> This package should behava as follows:
>
> 0. extract available languages from list of available locales
> (mapping language code -> language name)
I disagree, there is no reason to propose languages which have no
I find the current languagechooser complex and non-intuitive. To make
sure everyone know where I want it to move, I wrote down a little
description on where I want the package to move. I know we have been
discussing these things lately, so I thought this was good time to get
something down in wr
10 matches
Mail list logo