Re: Code cleanup: take 1

2009-05-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > > None of these should be removed. > > The *only* one which could possibly be discussed in this list is > > sarge-support. > > That's one. Only after discussion. IMO it's useful to keep it as an example as it's the most elaborate -support package we hav

Re: Code cleanup: take 1

2009-05-02 Thread Luk Claes
Frans Pop wrote: On Saturday 02 May 2009, Luk Claes wrote: * sarge-support * vmelilo-installer (also from unstable)? * sysconfig-writer * linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 * linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6 Can these safely be removed from the repository? None of these should be removed. The *only* one which

Re: Code cleanup: take 1

2009-05-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 12:38:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > I had a first look at cleaning up some code, first step being removal > > of packages from the repository that seem to not be used in the > > official archive anymore: > > Since when is d-

Re: Code cleanup: take 1

2009-05-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 02 May 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > > * linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6 This one actually could be removed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Re: Code cleanup: take 1

2009-05-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > * sarge-support > * vmelilo-installer (also from unstable)? > * sysconfig-writer > * linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 > * linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6 > > Can these safely be removed from the repository? None of these should be removed. The *only* one which could p

Re: Code cleanup: take 1

2009-05-02 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 12:38:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > I had a first look at cleaning up some code, first step being removal of > packages from the repository that seem to not be used in the official > archive anymore: Since when is d-i restricted to architectures in the main debian arch

Code cleanup: take 1

2009-05-02 Thread Luk Claes
Hi I had a first look at cleaning up some code, first step being removal of packages from the repository that seem to not be used in the official archive anymore: * sarge-support * vmelilo-installer (also from unstable)? * sysconfig-writer * linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 * linux-modules-di-m68k-2.