Bug#789475: udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad"

2017-01-30 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: busybox Version: 1:1.22.0-19 Followup-For: Bug #789475 Control: tag 789475 = patch confirmed fixed-upstream d-i Hi, I’ve stumbled upon this bug by means of d-i using “bad” as hostname right now as well and tracked it down to the offending piece of code myself. When reading the bugreport

Bug#789475: udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad"

2015-07-29 Thread Arthur Gautier
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 19:55:50 +0200 (CEST) Bodo Eggert <7egg...@online.de> wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2015, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote: > > > > The valid hostname "52-54-0-12-34-56" is recognized as bad > > > while

Bug#789475: udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad"

2015-06-21 Thread Bodo Eggert
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015, Geert Stappers wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote: > > The valid hostname "52-54-0-12-34-56" is recognized as bad > > while it should be valid according to rfc1123 (Section 2.1). > > What programma and/or device did

Processed: Re: Bug#789475: udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad"

2015-06-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #789475 [busybox] udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad" Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #789475 to the same tags previously set -- 789475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789475 Debian Bug Tracking System Cont

Processed: Re: Bug#789475: udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad"

2015-06-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #789475 [busybox] udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad" Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 789475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789475 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSC

Bug#789475: udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad"

2015-06-21 Thread Geert Stappers
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote: > > The valid hostname "52-54-0-12-34-56" is recognized as bad > while it should be valid according to rfc1123 (Section 2.1). What programma and/or device did recognize "52-54-0-12-34-56" as bad? How was the e

Bug#789475: udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad"

2015-06-21 Thread Bodo Eggert
Package: busybox Version: 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 Severity: normal Tags: d-i Dear Maintainer, The valid hostname "52-54-0-12-34-56" is recognized as bad while it should be valid according to rfc1123 (Section 2.1). - Capture of the DHCP reply: be1.lrz.bootps > 192.168.7.107.bootpc: BOOTP/DHCP,