Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote: > > The valid hostname "52-54-0-12-34-56" is recognized as bad > while it should be valid according to rfc1123 (Section 2.1).
What programma and/or device did recognize "52-54-0-12-34-56" as bad? How was the error encountered? Any error messages? Please elaborate what the reason for this bugreport is. > Capture of the DHCP reply: > be1.lrz.bootps > 192.168.7.107.bootpc: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 300, xid > 0x4cc35164, Flags [none] > Vendor-rfc1048 Extensions > DHCP-Message Option 53, length 1: ACK > Hostname Option 12, length 16: "52-54-0-12-34-56" That is content from a network packet sent by a DHCP server, which might be configured for providing such hostname. Please provide more information. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150621125655.gg27...@gpm.stappers.nl
