Thanks, I'll take a look when I finally get a spare moment!
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 13:24 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> Yes, you guessed correctly. The v2 patch is the "good" one.
>
> On 05/03/2015 03:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 21:25 -0500, David Lechner
Yes, you guessed correctly. The v2 patch is the "good" one.
On 05/03/2015 03:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 21:25 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
Tags: patch
I botched the first patch. This one fixes it correctly.
Thanks for the patch(es). The buglog at
https://bugs.d
Hi David,
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 21:25 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> Tags: patch
>
> I botched the first patch. This one fixes it correctly.
Thanks for the patch(es). The buglog at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783278 has somehow
ended up with the message ordering confused.
I
Tags: patch
I botched the first patch. This one fixes it correctly.
>From 6eb082b42ad9a7c22f08ecb9f18fab7f8891be95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Lechner
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:13:00 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Handle case when kernel == kfile check in boot_kernel_path
handler.
This only a
4 matches
Mail list logo