Thanks, I'll take a look when I finally get a spare moment! On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 13:24 -0500, David Lechner wrote: > Yes, you guessed correctly. The v2 patch is the "good" one. > > On 05/03/2015 03:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 21:25 -0500, David Lechner wrote: > >> Tags: patch > >> > >> I botched the first patch. This one fixes it correctly. > > Thanks for the patch(es). The buglog at > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783278 has somehow > > ended up with the message ordering confused. > > > > I'm pretty certain that the patch which should be correct is this one > > labelled in the subject as v2 at Message #10 and not what I suppose is > > v1 which for some reason didn't arrive until Message #15. The date > > headers match this interpretation. > > > > I suppose the first mail got delayed somehow on its way to the BTS so > > they appear in the opposite order in the log. > > > > I thought I ought to double check! > > > > Ian. > > > >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1431085317.2660.443.ca...@debian.org
