Processing control commands:
> tag -1 jessie sid
Bug #778773 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [partman-base] Jessie RC1
Installer parted server segfault
Bug #771617 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [partman-base] installer
beta 2: jessie parted_server segfault on AMD Athlon64
Bug #773274 {Done: Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 jessie sid
Cyril Brulebois (2015-03-04):
> And your hypothesis seems totally plausible, let's look at
> d56c74f310b02af4f81e5f5a5ba65b55fdbdc34e[1]:
> | Adapt parted_server code to handle new GNU Parted swap filesystem handling.
> |
> | r59025
>
> 1.
> http://anonscm.debian.or
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:22:22PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Wow, I'm glad I had been busy with other bits while you were discovering
> this. This seems spot-on!
I was just looking at the code and was trying to understand what was
initializing the structure when I suddenly noticed that no on
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #778773 [installation-reports] Jessie RC1 Installer parted server segfault
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
778773: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778773
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Lennart Sorensen (2015-03-04):
> It seems to me inspecting the code of parted_server.c that:
>
> deactivate_exception_handler();
> fstype = ped_file_system_probe(&(part->geom));
> if (fstype == NULL) {
>
It seems to me inspecting the code of parted_server.c that:
deactivate_exception_handler();
fstype = ped_file_system_probe(&(part->geom));
if (fstype == NULL) {
oprintf("none\n");
} else {
6 matches
Mail list logo
