[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:38:32PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've worked on modconf recently. Could you give it a try?
> > http://master.debian.org/~joey/NMU/modconf_0.2.30.0.1_all.deb
> > (it's no NMU but a MU, but well...)
>
> This looks alright,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:38:32PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've worked on modconf recently. Could you give it a try?
> http://master.debian.org/~joey/NMU/modconf_0.2.30.0.1_all.deb
> (it's no NMU but a MU, but well...)
This looks alright, except you've unravelled all the nesting.
Hi,
I've worked on modconf recently. Could you give it a try?
http://master.debian.org/~joey/NMU/modconf_0.2.30.0.1_all.deb
(it's no NMU but a MU, but well...)
Regards,
Joey
--
Whenever you meet yourself you're in a time loop or in front of a mirror.
Please always Cc to me when repl
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 05:58:09PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> IIRC modconf just calls modprobe, so if you have a 2.4-kernel-compatible
> modprobe/modutils it will work fine.
>
> I'm not sure this is really a modconf bug, but I'll leave it open for
> now.
I'm talking about the interactive ncu
> modules for 2.4 are named /lib/modules/2.4.0/kernel/foo/bar/baz.o
>
> modconf is looking for /lib/modules/2.4.0/foo/baz.o
>
> perhaps modconf should call find(1) to locate the modules.
IIRC modconf just calls modprobe, so if you have a 2.4-kernel-compatible
modprobe/modutils it will work fine
Previously Malcolm Parsons wrote:
> perhaps modconf should call find(1) to locate the modules.
perhaps it should scan modules.dep, much faster.
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
|
Package: modconf
Version: 0.2.27
Severity: wishlist
modules for 2.4 are named /lib/modules/2.4.0/kernel/foo/bar/baz.o
modconf is looking for /lib/modules/2.4.0/foo/baz.o
perhaps modconf should call find(1) to locate the modules.
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Architecture: i386
Ke
7 matches
Mail list logo