On 16/04/13 01:49, Michael Biebl wrote:
> The recommends is pointless, task-gnome-desktop depends on gnome-core
> which already has a Recommends on network-manager-gnome.
That is probably true but it is not going to cause harm by staying
there? So it may as well stay now and can be removed post-w
Am 15.04.2013 12:14, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> For unrelated reasons, d-i will need a new upload, so I can update
> tasksel today as well, before rc2 images get built again.
I don't want to sound like a broken record, but seeing that
network-manager-gnome in task-gnome-desktop was demoted to Reco
Steven Chamberlain (15/04/2013):
> I replied to your mail same day and used the words 'should work'...
Well, maybe that's just me, but that “should work” is no certainty at
all, nobody says “works for me” (quite the contrary, given Didier's
feedback after that). This “should work” was also drown
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:23:09AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>On 15/04/13 11:14, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> But you should have made it clear when I asked. I thought I made it
>> clear I needed feedback, and I wrote “*right now*”.
>
>I replied to your mail same day and used the words 'should
On 15/04/13 11:14, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> But you should have made it clear when I asked. I thought I made it
> clear I needed feedback, and I wrote “*right now*”.
I replied to your mail same day and used the words 'should work'...
> For unrelated reasons, d-i will need a new upload, so I can u
Steven Chamberlain (15/04/2013):
> For all the problems OdyX mentioned from testing, I've found a single
> cause and filed bug #705435. I've updated this page to demonstrate a
> functioning GNOME desktop on GNU/kFreeBSD:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_Desktop#Wheezy_GNOME
>
> On 1
For all the problems OdyX mentioned from testing, I've found a single
cause and filed bug #705435. I've updated this page to demonstrate a
functioning GNOME desktop on GNU/kFreeBSD:
https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_Desktop#Wheezy_GNOME
On 15/04/13 05:53, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I wa
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org):
> On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD
> > because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non
> > release critical...
>
> Just for the record, I'm not happy a
Am 14.04.2013 20:56, schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
> On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD
>> because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non
>> release critical...
>
> Just for the record, I'm not happy abou
On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD
> because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non
> release critical...
Just for the record, I'm not happy about this.
Why could this not have been fixed in any case, i
On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> According to the thread that follows
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2013/04/msg4.html, Gnome is
> too broken on kFreeBSD to be considered useful.
"Oops, an error occurred" is known as the GNOME 'fail whale'. It could
happen also on GNU/Linu
severity 704748 important
thanks
According to the thread that follows
https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2013/04/msg4.html, Gnome is
too broken on kFreeBSD to be considered useful.
As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD
because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can b
12 matches
Mail list logo
