On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: > As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD > because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non > release critical...
Just for the record, I'm not happy about this. Why could this not have been fixed in any case, it was obviously a mistake/oversight, creates a regression for kfreebsd-*, and I provided a patch which is trivial. How are users expected to be test GNOME anyway on kfreebsd if they're prevented from installing it since the rc1 installer. As a 'new' arch, people typically don't have installed systems to use as a basis to try things. Are kfreebsd-*'s GNOME CD-1 etc. going to be able to build if task-gnome-desktop is uninstallable? Is there any point building them? Furthermore what about tech-ctte decision #688772 that squeeze->wheezy upgrades (on GNU/Linux) should not pick up network-manager as a dependency? Is that would what happen if they have task-gnome-desktop installed and it Depends now on network-manager-gnome? Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/516afbf4.5030...@pyro.eu.org
