Processed: Re: Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 69197 doc-debian Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools Bug reassigned from package `base' to `doc-debian'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benha

Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-09-03 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [era eriksson] > > I get the impression from bugs.debian.org that only the receiving end > > can reclassify bugs. > > Literally, there is no access control mechanism, so anyone can use the > control@ interface. As a matter of etiquette, I believe th

Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-09-02 Thread Peter Samuelson
[era eriksson] > I get the impression from bugs.debian.org that only the receiving end > can reclassify bugs. Literally, there is no access control mechanism, so anyone can use the control@ interface. As a matter of etiquette, I believe that, along with the package maintainer, the bug submitter

Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-08-24 Thread era eriksson
On 23 Aug 2000 16:23:47 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I know how to do that. A naive user who is getting acquainted with >> Unix in general and Debian in particular is probably completely >> ignorant about backup tools and procedu

Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-08-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know how to do that. A naive user who is getting acquainted with > Unix in general and Debian in particular is probably completely > ignorant about backup tools and procedures. My point is that while the > Debian handbook (or whatever it's called) says

Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-08-23 Thread era eriksson
On 23 Aug 2000 10:41:53 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On 22 Aug 2000 22:48:17 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I don't understand. The base system is meant to be a minimally >> > functional system, not a rescu

Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-08-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 22 Aug 2000 22:48:17 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't understand. The base system is meant to be a minimally > > functional system, not a rescue system for recovery. It will be > > getting *smaller* in time, not larger.

Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools

2000-08-15 Thread era eriksson
Package: base Version: 2815 Severity: wishlist This should probably be severity: 2 or something like that but due to the nature of this report, I think "wishlist" is the most appropriate. I have a slightly old installation and if this has been fixed in newer releases of Debian, I'll have to