Bug#591756: udeb size increase for vconfig support in busybox

2011-02-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 21.01.2011 08:26, Matthew Palmer wrote: > Just for the record, the difference between the size of the binary in > busybox-udeb 1.17.1-9 (as is currently in git) when built on i386 with and > without vconfig is 384 bytes. vconfig in is 212732, vconfig out is 212348. > I built both locally in th

Bug#591756: udeb size increase for vconfig support in busybox

2011-01-21 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Martin Zobel-Helas writes: > On Fri Jan 21, 2011 at 15:02:30 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> Matthew Palmer writes: >> >>> Just for the record, the difference between the size of the binary in >>> busybox-udeb 1.17.1-9 (as is currently in git) when built on i386 with and >>> without vconfig is

Bug#591756: udeb size increase for vconfig support in busybox

2011-01-21 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Fri Jan 21, 2011 at 15:02:30 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Matthew Palmer writes: > > > Just for the record, the difference between the size of the binary in > > busybox-udeb 1.17.1-9 (as is currently in git) when built on i386 with and > > without vconfig is 384 bytes. > > I wonder if

Bug#591756: udeb size increase for vconfig support in busybox

2011-01-21 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Matthew Palmer writes: > Just for the record, the difference between the size of the binary in > busybox-udeb 1.17.1-9 (as is currently in git) when built on i386 with and > without vconfig is 384 bytes. I wonder if you really need this after all. vconfig is deprecated, and even the current squ

Bug#591756: udeb size increase for vconfig support in busybox

2011-01-20 Thread Matthew Palmer
Just for the record, the difference between the size of the binary in busybox-udeb 1.17.1-9 (as is currently in git) when built on i386 with and without vconfig is 384 bytes. vconfig in is 212732, vconfig out is 212348. I built both locally in the same chroot to remove any other biases (gcc versi