Bug#570410: #570410 partman-base: Please default to GB

2024-12-25 Thread Holger Wansing
Control: tags -1 + pending Holger Wansing wrote (Sun, 15 Dec 2024 21:08:48 +0100): > The patch from Maximilian does no longer apply, so I have created a merge > request: > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-base/-/merge_requests/10 This has been merged shortly. -- Holger Wansing

Processed: Re: Bug#570410: #570410 partman-base: Please default to GB

2024-12-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #570410 [partman-base] partman-base: Please default to GB Added tag(s) pending. -- 570410: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570410 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#570410: #570410 partman-base: Please default to GB

2024-12-15 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote (Sun, 15 Dec 2024 14:31:27 +0100): > On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 01:41:36PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > maximilian attems wrote: > > > if one partitions and neglects to add a suffix partman falls back > > > to use megabytes. noticed on a goofed installed where

Bug#570410: #570410 partman-base: Please default to GB

2024-12-15 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 01:41:36PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > maximilian attems wrote: > > if one partitions and neglects to add a suffix partman falls back > > to use megabytes. noticed on a goofed installed where debootstrap > > failed due to full disk. better default to gigabytes these d

Bug#570410: #570410 partman-base: Please default to GB

2024-12-15 Thread Holger Wansing
maximilian attems wrote: > if one partitions and neglects to add a suffix partman falls back > to use megabytes. noticed on a goofed installed where debootstrap > failed due to full disk. better default to gigabytes these days. Is it time to really default to GB now? Holger -- Holger Wansin