On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 09:26 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Emmet Hikory wrote:
> > I "really, really" wanted to do it to ease working with tools that
> > request graphical sudo authentication for devices that didn't have
> > keyboards. Yes, this is pointlessly insecure, and yes, there are input
> >
Emmet Hikory wrote:
> I "really, really" wanted to do it to ease working with tools that
> request graphical sudo authentication for devices that didn't have
> keyboards. Yes, this is pointlessly insecure, and yes, there are input
> tools that can be used in some cases, but these tend to be fa
Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fair enough. While it makes it easier for me to do what I'm doing,
> the fact that it's a rare use case, insecure-by-default, and not too
> hard to script is sufficient for me to withdraw the request in the face
> of any opposition, rather than fix t
Frans Pop wrote:
>> For most use cases, this is clearly entirely the correct behaviour. In
>> those rare cases where someone really, really, wants to have an empty
>> password for an automatically created user, it would be nice if
>> user-setup would allow this directly, rather than requiring work
> For most use cases, this is clearly entirely the correct behaviour. In
> those rare cases where someone really, really, wants to have an empty
> password for an automatically created user, it would be nice if
> user-setup would allow this directly, rather than requiring workarounds
> such as res
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Except by a newline before the new comments your patch looks right.
Thanks for the review. I've attached an updated patch, also against
r56349 that includes the newline.
--
Emmet HIKORY
Index: debian/user-setup-udeb.templates
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I've created the patch against revision 56349 in SVN, but would be happy
>> to update it to a newer revision with modifications if requested.
>
> Your patch doesn't follow the coding style (I guess you did
Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've created the patch against revision 56349 in SVN, but would be happy
> to update it to a newer revision with modifications if requested.
Your patch doesn't follow the coding style (I guess you did it to
avoid a bigger diff) and would be nice if you c
Package: user-setup
Version: 1.23
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu intrepid ubuntu-patch
When performing an install, the user cannot proceed without entering a
non-empty password. This remains the case even when an empty password
has been specifically
9 matches
Mail list logo
