Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fair enough. While it makes it easier for me to do what I'm doing,
> the fact that it's a rare use case, insecure-by-default, and not too
> hard to script is sufficient for me to withdraw the request in the face
> of any opposition, rather than fix the patch more generally. If someone
> else has a strong enough feeling that it should be present, I'm more
> than willing to update the patch to meet the guidelines above.
I believe it is a nice option to be supported, even more that the
Debian Embedded effort is starting to be integrated on the
distribution.
With that in mind, I also believe it is not worth to get it included
in Lenny and then we should postpone it for after release.
So to summarise:
- let it for Lenny+1;
- fix the description of the templace;
- add support for root passwordless;
Do people agree with my POV?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
