Processed: Re: Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Lowering severity as the dmraid support is fixed in daily images > severity 497110 normal Bug#497110: boot loader installation failed when dmraid=true Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > clone 497110 -1 Bug#497110: boot loader installation fail

Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-23 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto: > Tested, unfortunately root is empty: Hi, attached debdiff fixes the root detection, can you review it please? Giuseppe diff -Nru grub-installer-1.34/debian/changelog grub-installer-1.35/debian/changelog --- grub-installer-1.34/debian/changelog2008-09-22

Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-23 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Frans Pop ha scritto: > I've not tested os-prober functionality for dmraid. Tested, unfortunately root is empty: # This entry automatically added by the Debian installer for an existing # linux installation on /dev/mapper/sil_aiahbgbgaaaj1. title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.26-1-686 (

Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-18 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 15 September 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > The changes have now been committed as revisions r55850 to r55856. The > first commit is a semi-related bug fix. The second and last commits are > basically your work with a few minor cleanups. The other commits are > improvements by me created while

Re: Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 September 2008, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Frans Pop ha scritto: > > The physical disks show as 4GB, but the (correctly detected) dmraid > > device is only 100.8MB in size, which is a bit small for actual use. > > You are right, also for hpt45x disk size is encoded in the .dat file. >

Re: Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-08 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Frans Pop ha scritto: > The physical disks show as 4GB, but the (correctly detected) dmraid device > is only 100.8MB in size, which is a bit small for actual use :-P > > I get the same if I use the raw images with qemu. > > Any ideas? You are right, also for hpt45x disk size is encoded in the .

Re: Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Ok, with Highpoint 45X ATARAID this is simple. Thanks for that! It's close but does not quite work for me yet. I get 4GB raw images and can convert those to vdi images for VirtualBox (using the same conversion I used for the sil images). Th

Re: Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-07 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto: >> reason to use the procedure you devised would be to generate disk images >> of a different size (80GB was a bit of a pain for the conversion from >> vbox to VirtualBox format for example). > > Uhmm, there are some unknown metadata sectors, I think this isn't pos

Re: Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > The offsets are probably some fixed distance from the end of the disk. The offsets appear to be: for i in 0 1 2 3; do echo $(( ($(cat hda_sil.size) - ($i * 512 + 1)) * 512 )) done fdisk -ul /dev/hda reports: 80026361856 bytes; 156301488 sect

Re: Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-07 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Frans Pop ha scritto: > *.size is the disk size in sectors. > hda_{0,1,2,3}_sil.dat are all identical, but there are some differences > between .dat files for hda and hdb. > *.offset files are numbers close to the end of the disk, so apparently the > SATA RAID signature is saved 4 times near the

Re: Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto: > > Approximately "dmraid -rD" generates three files, from this we can > > extrapolate metadata, and with a hex editor we can add the fake > > signature to the qemu/virtualbox drive Let's take this out of the BTS

Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-07 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto: > I'm working on this, but it is not very simple for me. > Approximately "dmraid -rD" generates three files, from this we can extrapolate > metadata, and with a hex editor we can add the fake signature to the > qemu/virtualbox drive Ok,this procedure seems to work for

Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-07 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Frans Pop ha scritto: > On Sunday 07 September 2008, Frans Pop wrote: >> I've done some testing using Giuseppe's businesscard image in >> VirtualBox ... > > I was very surprised that you don't actually need BIOS support for dmraid. > Apparently it really only scans the harddisks for some specific

Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-07 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Frans Pop ha scritto: > changes merged for Lenny. This means the following actions are needed: > - get an OK for the change in devicemapper from maintainer and RT > - get an OK for the change in parted from RT (and maybe check that the > patch will also get accepted upstream?) > - get updated de

Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 07 September 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > I've done some testing using Giuseppe's businesscard image in > VirtualBox ... I was very surprised that you don't actually need BIOS support for dmraid. Apparently it really only scans the harddisks for some specific headers and bases the rest on

Bug#497110: improved dmraid support in D-I

2008-09-07 Thread Frans Pop
In an effort to reduce the indentation in my MUA for this thread I'm starting from the top :-) I've done some testing using Giuseppe's businesscard image in VirtualBox and based on the results I've made some additional changes. The end results of the tests are excellent: - I have seen no proble