Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 14:40, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > The only thing not covered yet is the daily builds of the graphical > > installer, but there is no real rush for that. I have saved the last > > good build. > > http://people.deb

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > The only thing not covered yet is the daily builds of the graphical > installer, but there is no real rush for that. I have saved the last good > build. http://people.debian.org/~cjwatson/d-i/powerpc-gtk/ Cheers, -- Colin Watson

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-29 Thread Frans Pop
I also answered Sven privately on this. On Wednesday 29 March 2006 09:06, Eddy Petrişor wrote: > > About the graphical installer, what are the plan for mainline > > merging, it was supposed to be soon after the beta2 release, was it > > not ? > > I _think_ the open point if the udebs dependency re

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-28 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 3/29/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 March 2006 01:56, Sven Luther wrote: > > Try 'aptitude update; aptitude (dist-?)upgrade'. > > A new libnewt has been available since: > > 0.52.2-2 (latest build at Mar

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-28 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 29 March 2006 01:56, Sven Luther wrote: > > I don't know who is to blame for this, probably the powerpc buildd or > > something, but this is clearly something of which i am not responsible, > > since the d-i build-depends are

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-28 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 01:56, Sven Luther wrote: > I don't know who is to blame for this, probably the powerpc buildd or > something, but this is clearly something of which i am not responsible, > since the d-i build-depends are clearly satisfied on my machine, as i > run dpkg-checkbuilddeps on

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-28 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:36:44AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 16:43]: > > I didn't touch the buildd since more than a week, so it is clear > > that (again) the d-i team broke the daily builds and don't take the > > responsability to fix them. > >

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-28 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 01:27:55PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-28 10:32]: > > > Did you actually take *any look* at the failure at all? If so, you'd > > > know that you're blaming the wrong people... > > Actually, Frans is blaming me, so ... > > You

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:43:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:23:47AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > This is not an initramfs-tools problem, but the result of powerpc daily > > d-i builds, for which Sven himself is responsible, failing for the last > > few days. > > I di

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-28 10:32]: > > Did you actually take *any look* at the failure at all? If so, you'd > > know that you're blaming the wrong people... > Actually, Frans is blaming me, so ... You mean for not taking a look at the build logs from time to time, and a new ins

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-28 Thread Geert Stappers
> > Or, to make it clearer: that there's nobody to blame. Dependencies in > unstable change... just get on with it. On Sparc I did apt-get install libnewt0.52 to get daily build working again. HtH GSt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-28 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:36:44AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 16:43]: > > I didn't touch the buildd since more than a week, so it is clear > > that (again) the d-i team broke the daily builds and don't take the > > responsability to fix them. > >

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-28 08:36]: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 16:43]: > > I didn't touch the buildd since more than a week, so it is clear > > that (again) the d-i team broke the daily builds and don't take the > > responsability to fix them. > > Did yo

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 16:43]: > I didn't touch the buildd since more than a week, so it is clear > that (again) the d-i team broke the daily builds and don't take the > responsability to fix them. Did you actually take *any look* at the failure at all? If so, you'd know th

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 27 March 2006 17:21, Sven Luther wrote: > with something like 18 hours of interval between them, which i believe If anybody can tell me where these 18 hours come from, I'll be happy to consider apologizing. I replied two times on the same subject as there was both a thread on d-boot a

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:12:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Just for the record. > > On Monday 27 March 2006 16:43, Sven Luther wrote: > > And Frans, you are an unfeeling bastard, i personally asked you > > yesterday to not pick on me like you are doing now, since i was facing > > another strong

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Just for the record. On Monday 27 March 2006 16:43, Sven Luther wrote: > And Frans, you are an unfeeling bastard, i personally asked you > yesterday to not pick on me like you are doing now, since i was facing > another strong crisis with my mother yesterday, and really didn't need > such bullshit

Re: Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:23:47AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 27 March 2006 00:42, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > > (X-Debbugs-CC to debian-kernel at Sven Luther's request, perhaps this > > should have been filed against initramfs-tools directly) > > This is not an initramfs-tools problem, b

Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-26 Thread Shyamal Prasad
fjp> This is not an initramfs-tools problem, but the result of fjp> powerpc daily d-i builds, for which Sven himself is fjp> responsible, failing for the last fjp> few days. Just for the record, I tried d-i rc2 and it worked like a charm (except for a constant set of error windows

Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 27 March 2006 00:42, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > (X-Debbugs-CC to debian-kernel at Sven Luther's request, perhaps this > should have been filed against initramfs-tools directly) This is not an initramfs-tools problem, but the result of powerpc daily d-i builds, for which Sven himself is

Bug#359164: [powerpc64] d-i fails, base-installer/initramfs/no-generator

2006-03-26 Thread Shyamal Prasad
Package: installation-reports Severity: important (X-Debbugs-CC to debian-kernel at Sven Luther's request, perhaps this should have been filed against initramfs-tools directly) INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: powerpc net-inst daily build (March 26, 2006) uname -a: (normally I run