On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:46:59PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [David Nusinow]
> > That's probably true, but it's a pointless dependancy at this point. I'm
> > just going to switch it to dash and be done with it. discover1 doesn't
> > really need to be built on stable as far as I know.
>
>
[David Nusinow]
> That's probably true, but it's a pointless dependancy at this point. I'm
> just going to switch it to dash and be done with it. discover1 doesn't
> really need to be built on stable as far as I know.
I build it on stable for Debian Edu / Skolelinux. Please do not
change the pack
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:48:25PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I imagine ash is there so that it's easy to build discover for stable
> and have it work (stable didn't have dash). The easiest fix would be to
> switch the order and make the dependency 'dash | ash'.
That's probably true, but it's a
> I imagine ash is there so that it's easy to build discover for stable
> and have it work (stable didn't have dash).
I see.
> The easiest fix would be to switch the order and make the dependency
'dash | ash'.
Agree.
--
Regards,
Alan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:10:04PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: discover
> Version: 1.5-2
> Severity: normal
>
> discover has dependency:
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libdiscover1, debconf (>> 0.5), ash | dash
>
> But ash has dependency:
> Pre-Depends: dash
>
> So "ash | dash
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: normal
discover has dependency:
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libdiscover1, debconf (>> 0.5), ash | dash
But ash has dependency:
Pre-Depends: dash
So "ash | dash" is misleading.
Look at this example:
# apt-get install discover
The following NEW pac
6 matches
Mail list logo
