This bug report should probably be closed. I will file new installation
reports for newer installer images.
Thanks
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 780-492-7660
Computing and Network Services University of Alberta
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:13:00PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
This time it actually got to the point of installing a kernel image.
Unfortunately, the installer chose kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64-smp when
it should have chosen kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc32.
I think t
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:13:00PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> This time it actually got to the point of installing a kernel image.
> Unfortunately, the installer chose kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64-smp when
> it should have chosen kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc32.
I think this is fixed in cvs ve
I went back and set the install to use testing, copied /target/bin/sleep
and /target/lib/librt.so.1 to /bin and /lib, respectively and wiped the
prevous installation.
This time it actually got to the point of installing a kernel image.
Unfortunately, the installer chose kernel-image-2.4.24-spar
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004/03/04 daily image from
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/sparc/daily/
uname -a: Linux opal 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004
sparc unknown
Date: 2004/03/04
Method: network installation, CD-ROM, mirror: sunsite.ualberta
5 matches
Mail list logo
